klangcola

joined 2 years ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
I'm curious, which settings app layout do you prefer? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Behold! The power of search beckons you :P

I completely stopped caring about how the Systems Settings menu is organised after all the improvements they did to search a few years ago

Best web archiving software for complex sites and sites requiring logins? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

SingleFile provides a faithful representation of the original webpage, so bloated webpages are indeed saved as bloated html files.

On the plus side you're getting an exact copy, but on the downside an exact copy may not be necessary and takes a huge amount of space.

Best web archiving software for complex sites and sites requiring logins? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

SingleFile is a browser addon to save a complete web page into a single HTML file. SingleFile is a Web Extension (and a CLI tool) compatible with Chrome, Firefox (Desktop and Mobile), Microsoft Edge, Safari, Vivaldi, Brave, Waterfox, Yandex browser, and Opera.

SingleFile can also be integrated with bookmark managers hoarder and linkding browser extensions. So your browser does the capture, which means you are already logged in, have dismissed the cookie banner, solved the capthas or whatever else annoyance is on the webpage.

ArchiveBox and I believe also Linkwarden use SingleFile (but as CLI from the server side) to capture web pages, as well as other tools and formats. This works well for simple/straightforward web pages, but not for annoying we pages with cookie banners, capthas, and other popups.

Sanity check: am I crazy for wanting to wipe everything and do/learn from scratch? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Lol, I'm just over a week in to learning NixOS and this feels so true 😂

I feel like I'm just starting on the incline, luckily I don't have any sturdy rope on hand 😂

You just gotta think different in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Wait what, why? I'm out of the loop. What's up with Proxmox and glib 2.0?

Sanity check: am I crazy for wanting to wipe everything and do/learn from scratch? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Reading your post again, you should start by moving your docker management from CasaOS to vanilla docker-compose files, and keep them in a git repo.

I still think you definitely should look in to NixOS and what it can offer, cause it seems like that is where your mindset is going.

But NixOS is a drastic change, you should start by just converting your individual services one by one from CasaOS management to docker-compose files. One compose file for all services is possible, but I would recommend one compose file for each service. Later you can move from Debian to NixOS while using the same docker-compose files.

Sanity check: am I crazy for wanting to wipe everything and do/learn from scratch? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I would like to have a system when I know what I did, what is opened/installed/activated and what is not

You sound like you need to to look in to Nix and NixOS. The TLDR is that everything is declared in a configuration file(s), which you can and should back up in git. The config files tell you exactly what you did , and the config file comments together with git commit history tell you why.

The whole system is built from this configuration file. Rollback is trivially easy, either by rebooting and selecting an older build during the boot manager, or reverting to an older git commit and rebuilding (no reboot required, so usually faster)

Now fair warning, Nix (and NixOS) is a big topic, very different from normal way of thinking about software distribution and OS. Nix is not for everyone.

You should also at the very least have a git repo for docker-compose files for your services. Again, that will declaratively tell you what you did and why.

Also, if NixOS is too extreme, you should also look in to declarative management tools like Ansible etc

Need coffee in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Am I looking in to a mirror?

ArchiveBox/good-karma-kit: A Docker Compose bundle to run on servers with spare CPU, RAM, disk, and bandwidth to help the world. Includes Tor, ArchiveWarrior, BOINC, and more... in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago

Not a problem when self-hosting on own hardware. Especially in winter. Overly complicated spaceheater goes brrrr

Home Assistant in Proxmox, local dns not working in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hard to say without knowing which method you used to install HomeAssistant.

But I never found mdns .local addresses to be very reliable. They work 80-90% of the time, but the remaining 10-20% are a hassle.

Instead I'd recommend you install PiHole (in a docker container is easiest). PiHole is a DNS server intended for network-level ad-blocking. But it also have a handy feature of defining local DNS entries, so you can have HomeAssistant.myhome or HomeAssistant.whatever (.local should not be used with PiHole local DNS because .local is meant for mdns)

First home server advice in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Some key points regarding Proxmox:

  • Even if you only want to run two services, you still want to keep them isolated. This can save you much pain and frustration in the future when they require upgrades
  • Proxmox let's you easily manage VM and LXC containers. So you can easily manage backups, or spinning up a separate test instance of your service. Which again, can save you pain and frustration when it comes to future updates of your services.
  • Backups are even better if you can deploy the separate Proxmox Backup Server
  • Should you ever want to add another service in the future, you can test it out in a new VM or container without it affecting your existing services at all
  • ZFS is indeed quite memory hungry, but AFAIK it's mainly used for the read cache, and can be tuned to use less RAM at the cost of performance
  • ZFS is mentioned a lot because it's good, but Proxmox also supports a range of other storage technologies: LVM, mdraid, EXT4, CEPH
  • Proxmox is just standard Debian and KVM/QEMU virtual machines under the hood. Which means you can use standard tooling and workflow should you need it for some edgecase.
  • You mentioned Jellyfin in a container: My understanding is that Jellyfin in Docker has some extra limitations or complexities when it comes to hardware encoding.
    • Jellyfin also has official documentation for how to deploy in LXC container and get HW transcoding working (Less complex than in Docker).
    • LXC containers are not like Docker containers. While a Docker container is meant to be an immutable image of a (single) application, LXC is more like a full fledged VM, but without the overhead of virtualization. LXC containers are full systems, and you install software via the usual apt, dnf etc
    • The "correct" way to run Docker in Proxmox is to run Docker in a Virtual machine. Installing Docker inside a LXC container is also possible, with some caveats. Installing Docker directly on the Proxmox host is not recommended

For reference, my oldest Proxmox server is a 2013 AMD dualcore 16GB DDR2 ram with VMs on LVMthin on a single SSD, with legacy VM doing mdraid of 3 HDDs using hardware passthrough. Performance is still OK, the overhead from Proxmox is negligible compared to strain from the actual workloads

[SOLVED] Any Android Qr app (preferably Open Source) that allows decoding via "open with" or share? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

"QR & Barcode scanner" is Free an Open Source, and supports what you want (if i understood you correctly) https://github.com/wewewe718/QrAndBarcodeScanner

Looks like it's not been updated in a while, but it works just fine. Available on F-Droid and on Google Play

66
Why use Named volume vs Anonymous volume in Docker? (reddthat.com)
 

What are the pros and cons of using Named vs Anonymous volumes in Docker for self-hosting?

I've always used "regular" Anonymous volumes, and that's what is usually in official docker-compose.yml examples for various apps:

volumes:
  - ./myAppDataFolder:/data

where myAppDataFolder/ is in the same folder as the docker-compose.yml file.

As a self-hoster I find this neat and tidy; my docker folder has a subfolder for each app. Each app folder has a docker-compose.yml, .env and one or more data-folders. I version-control the compose files, and back up the data folders.

However some apps have docker-compose.yml examples using named volumes:

services:
  mealie:
    volumes:
      - mealie-data:/app/data/
volumes:
  mealie-data:

I had to google documentation https://docs.docker.com/engine/storage/volumes/ to find that the volume is actually called mealie_mealie-data

$ docker volume ls
DRIVER    VOLUME NAME
...
local     mealie_mealie-data

and it is stored in /var/lib/docker/volumes/mealie_mealie-data/_data

$ docker volume inspect mealie_mealie-data
...
  "Mountpoint": "/var/lib/docker/volumes/mealie_mealie-data/_data",
...

I tried googling the why of named volumes, but most answers were talking about things that sounded very enterprise'y, docker swarms, and how all state information should be stored in "the database" so you shouldnt need to ever touch the actual files backing the volume for any container.

So to summarize: Named volumes, why? Or why not? What are your preferences? Given the context that we are self-hosting, and not running huge enterprise clusters.

18
YouTuber Smii7y discovers the way of Rock and Stone (youtube.com)
 

The joys of discovering DRG for the first time and gleefully learning all the mechanics. Extra props for the careful and methodical test to verify if the game has Friendly Fire

view more: next ›