llamacoffee

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I believe that's from the ship's recent really long static fire which lasted almost a minute!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I think you're right. It's definitely new rhetoric for them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When fixed to Stage 1 during ascent, Andromeda’s thrusters are positioned outboard of the Stage 1 outer diameter. This allows Andromeda to ignite while still attached to the first stage without causing damage to the base of Stage 2, and without the need for a heavy one-time-use interstage shield to protect Stage 1.

Would you look at that, another hot-stage design!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Doubt it happens this spring, but I like their talk about potential future Mars missions. Exciting!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Very doomer. Does lemmy have a "remind me in 7 years" bot? 😅

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wow this is the most depressing comment section I've ever seen.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The second stage of a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket remained in orbit following a launch Saturday from Vandenberg Space Force Base, California. The rocket successfully deployed a new batch of Starlink Internet satellites but was supposed to reignite its engine for a braking maneuver to head for a destructive reentry over the Pacific Ocean. While airspace warning notices from the FAA showed a reentry zone over the eastern Pacific Ocean, publicly available US military tracking continued to show the upper stage in orbit this week. Sources also told Ars that SpaceX delayed two Falcon 9 launches this week by a day to allow time for engineers to evaluate the problem.

3 in 6 months ... This is the third time since last July that the Falcon 9's upper stage has encountered a problem in flight. On one occasion, the upper stage failed to reach its targeted orbit, leading to the destruction of 20 Starlink satellites. Then, an upper stage misfired during a deorbit burn after an otherwise successful launch in September, causing debris to fall outside of the pre-approved danger area. After both events, the FAA briefly grounded the Falcon 9 rocket while SpaceX conducted an investigation. This time, an FAA spokesperson said the agency won't require an investigation. "All flight events occurred within the scope of SpaceX’s licensed activities," the spokesperson told Ars.

Again? Damn that's concerning.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bro is this really about to happen? Don't get me wrong, the circumstances are suspicious at best, but it's been a long time coming! Does anyone else think this public notice could be political posturing?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What a strange story this has turned out to be. I really hope the rover makes it to the moon.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Honestly, yeah. Yesterday's failure was such a bummer. It's understandable, but still a bummer. Gotta go orbital to get anything done too. The good news is, even yesterday's kaboom should only set them back a month or two at most (just my guess).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So clean! I love it when we get landing audio.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think I agree with you... to a degree. On one hand something like CLPS has been a questionable use of funds at best, but on the other hand a NASA investment got us the greatest aerospace company in the history of humanity (SpaceX). Maybe it really depends how the program is structured?

All that being said, I'm not sure how Challenger relates to this considering that was a NASA program.

view more: next ›