mac12m99

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Cut that 1% by prohibiting most polluting activities of these people, would cut at maximum 16% of global emission, as stated in the article. As that's a one-time move, emissions will continue to grow, it will just give some month at best.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I already know Searxng but never tried extensively, I might give a serious try

I've used duckduckgo but I remember was really slow loading results ๐Ÿค”

For brave search, I've never took it seriously, I should try also this if you say results are good. But how they found themselves?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I've tried time ago but it seems to take the results and nothing else (I mean, no summary on top of the results, no table with restaurant number/time of opening ecc..) -> I don't know how to call this

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (10 children)

I am the only one that use Linux and bing as a default search? (On firefox) I personally think bing have better results than google right now

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

You need a schedulable power source if you want to fully replace carbon. A lot of batteries with super high capacity (that may exists in the future) could stabilize solar enough, and a lot of solar arrays may give enough power, but in summers you you will be forced to throw away some of the energy, which is a big waste. And this is an hypothetical scenario, nuclear is a technology that already exists, we could have decarbonised decades ago using nuclear. -> Don't get me wrong, I don't mean that we should rely on nuclear power alone, but we should first cover the base energy load with nuclear, then use solar and wind for the rest

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

It shouldn't be possible to break any service but hackers do that daily. If proper security is in place they will need some 0day exploits, but it's not impossible, just extremely difficult

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

I know, but that won't change the eventuality I described

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Bro, what I said is that an attacker who someways get access to production, can push modified source code that send cleartext password to him before everything else.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The votes might be the one from his instance (I've no time to check right now), as I've understanded, upvotes and down votes are instance specific, so, this means for the same post: Instance a show 10 upvotes Instance b show 5 (The post is in instance a) Which means a admin know who are the 10 people but can't know who are the 5 from instance b, and instance b admin know who are his 5 people and not the 10 from instance a. (I might be wrong, if it's the case please correct me)

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Are you sure that every server can see any other server upvotes? As I know, upvotes are only from your home instance, which means only your instance admin can see that

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I think it's a good idea to sum these statistics, but not for all instances (as it will be super easy to hijack with fake instances). Admin should manually select instances they trust and get the subscribed count summed.

view more: next โ€บ