I think the joke is that they have it sideways and now all their heads are turned sideways as a result. He found what was making their heads tilted. That's my interpretation.
missveeronica
joined 2 years ago
New Mexico governor issues order suspending the right to carry firearms in public across Albuquerque
I wish I could give you a gold award.
Spelling is hard. Fixed that for you.
New Mexico governor issues order suspending the right to carry firearms in public across Albuquerque
From what I saw, even the Democrat AG of New Mexico won't support or defend this in court.
Double album, four decent songs. Just my honest opinion. Your milage may vary.
According to the article from the nytimes, she raised money by asking for tokens in exchange for their suggestions to perform sex acts.
Edit: or was it wapo? I read it somewhere that she was accepting money in exchange for sex acts.
My comment was about how she feels this is an invasion of privacy not about the legality of the situation. She posted these on the internet with her own free will for money. She didn't have a problem posing for them.when it benefited her. Now, though, it's a problem.
Personally, I have no problem with her wanting to explore her sensuality. Good for her. I stop feeling sorry for her when she then declares it an invasion of privacy.
I find it funny that they used the term "invasion of privacy". She and her hubby went onto Chatterbate (I don't know the exact website name) and took tips from others to perform (according to my morning paper). That's a public display. And the fact that it didn't dawn on her that this could be out there is astonishing. I know if I ever put a picture on the internet, it's there FOREVER, and just because I'm a nobody doesn't mean someone out there archived it for later.
Edit: I changed leaked to invasion of privacy.
Just one part of his body needed to be behind the line of scrimmage. I haven't seen the full play, but from the screenshot, it looks like his right foot is behind that line, which counts. But I can't tell for sure.
So you're okay with it being fine for a White House administration telling tech companies what they can and can't allow? If so, then just wait until.the next Republican gets into the White House. You may not like this because it's against Bidens White House, but this ruling will prevent Trump from doing it as well...if he somehow got back into office....which won't happen, but still. It's a precedent.
Wasn't there a football player that was accused of his rape at a party and everyone thought he was guilty, until the proof of his innocence came out. These threads might not look good in the future.