Of course, nothing wrong with it. In fact it makes OP's quandary a lot easier! I'm looking into something with 20TB or so of capacity myself, and that's given me an appreciation for how much simpler it is to solve this problem at 2TB.
natch
2TB is insanely small for a NAS. At that point, you could honestly just run a Pi 5 with M.2 HAT and a 2TB SSD for something like $200 total. Could always buy a second Pi for mirroring and even locate it in a friend or family member's house for mirroring and backup.
I use a Pi 4 with 7 TB of external SSDs just fine at home. It also hosts a pi.hole ad blocking server, my 1TBish jellyfin music streaming collection, my network share for kodi, an always-on VPN for my phone and laptops, and a few other small services. I'm sure I could upgrade for better read/write speeds. But everything is performant enough as is, and it's completely silent and fan-free in my living room by the router. Honestly for most services a Pi with a passive cooler will perform admirably.
Syncthing on my home server, synced with each device I use for notetaking, has been glorious so far. I wish Obsidian would offer Sync for a cheaper rate, because I'd pay if it felt like anything near the cost of actual sync and storage. But Obsidian's cheapest tier is more expensive than my email hosting!
Longevity is worse than non-folding phones, simply because the hinge and folding screen are wear parts.
Camera is worse, because there's less z-distance for lens depth. If they push it with a bigger camera bump, you wind up with a maximum thickness of easily over 15mm very quickly, even if the rest of the phone is thin, that hurts.
Battery life is worse, because two separate batteries with puncture protection, folding screen, digitizer, etc in between are heavier and less power-dense than a single large battery.
And the price is higher because there's more screen, more batteries, more materials, and more R&D to pay back in the hinge and fold mech.
The Z flip is the most tempting to me simply because the height and width are far more attractive than current monster-sized phones. But it's disingenuous to pretend the plastic inner screen (yes, that's literally what that top layer is, not glass), the cost, the inferior battery, and the inferior camera aren't serious compromises.
And all for what? So I can have a giant inner screen? I think my (smaller than any modern phone) phone is already too large, too addicting, and too tough to use with one hand. For serious tasks and videos I use my laptop.
I believe it is awesome for you. But there are downsides.