nia_the_cat
Agree, the more they say stuff like this the more I'm worried about the game
If they can pull it off awesome, but this makes me expect yet another walking simulator with barely any content
So many times I've watched a movie or played a game and saw that audience rating and critics rating were polar opposites.
Sometimes it feels like it's their job to just be the opposite of the audience reception.
Just checked the instances list and it still shows kbin.social as federated, so it's likely an issue or bug.
If it's a different one than kbin.social I'm not sure.
You can go to lemmy.world homepage and click instances at the bottom, then ctrl+f (or equivalent find in page feature for mobile browsers) and search your instance name.
If it's near the bottom under the blocked section it's defederated but above that it's usually just a federation issue.
If you deactivate your Facebook account (not delete) you can make it where you can only access Facebook Messenger, but you don't have a public facing Facebook account. That way you only get the messaging side of it, minimizing the data they can collect on you. The account still exists but you give them less data. Giving bogus data doesn't help as much as not giving it at all, being as generic as possible, since buyers pay more for targeted data regardless of the content.
I wouldn't leave those posts up if you're volunteering for a charity regardless.
I'm still not gonna play it for at least like a year.
If it's buggy on release, then I can wait until it's not. If it ends up being great on release and not buggy, then I still get the benefit of a year of improvements, balancing, new content, etc. and have an even better experience.
Not that I think it's gonna be a flop or anything, I just don't have that sort of trust in any game studios at all anymore.
All that aside, I'm very hyped for it
The posts, not comments by the users on other instances posts
I don't know how many times Meta has to literally be worse than a movie villain for people to stop having stockholm syndrome.
They've ran experiments on their users putting negative content in their feeds to see how it affects their mental state, if you want that stuff on here, well, I don't even know what to say.
They have a track record of being absolute garbage for decades.
Why does everything have to have Meta in it?
I wish Zuckerberg would keep his toes away from us
If every single person who walks on to that street gets instantly beaten, stabbed, or have pedophilia shoved in their face, I would absolutely want someone to stop me from walking down that part of the street.
There is a reason that 500-1000+ instances block these instances of their own accord, and it's because those instances don't provide any value whatsoever to any who decides to open it. It's dangerous to be connected with that kind of stuff at all, there is no neutral stance on this, because taking a neutral stance on allowing the bad actors is just enabling them, as well as opening instance owners and their users up to legal trouble.
There's a good reason most people have never heard of any instances on this list, and people who don't want any instances to be blocked would only realize how big of an issue this is the day that they do make an account on an instance that don't block them, and promptly have their all feed flooded with swastikas and lolicon.
If there's a street that says "walk down this street to get stabbed" I'd take a wild guess that that street should probably have a safeguard preventing people from walking down it, there has to be some level of moderation to keep things from falling into chaos.
Instances that do not defederate from these quickly become a Nazi bar. I chose my Lemmy instance specifically because of its stance on defederating from instances like these. I'd rather not have pedophilia, swastikas and hate on my all feed when I open Lemmy.
These are the top 50 blocked instances, with tons of instances blocking them, yet most lemmy instances aren't little 10 user instances, they has a full stream of content throughout the entire day. If this was an issue, it would've already happened on Mastodon which is much more popular and much more aggressive on average about defederating with instances, commonly having instances that have over 50-100+ instances blocked, yet are still connected with the vast majority of users.
Censorship is a perfectly valid moderation tool, and is the reason that any of these services are even usable at all in the first place. Without defederation, instance admins have to go through every single one of the tidal wave of reports that would inevitably come from these instances, and that would require a full-time team of a few dozen admins just to even begin to keep up with it, when most instances barely have a handful of admins at all, who are also likely juggling a career in addition to moderating their instance.
Edit: this ended up a bit of a rant, but I figure this thread was a good of a place as any for it. I have a lot of respect for all of the instance admins for voluntarily keeping the instances free from all of this stuff.
One way to think of it is to think of each instance as a person/account, and every instance that they federate with is someone they follow, and anyone that they're defederated with is someone they've blocked.
So if one instance follows (federates) with another, that instances users will see posts and users from that other instance.
If an instance blocks (defederates) with another, it prevents the instance from sending or receiving any new posts or comments with the blocked instance, cutting all communication. In the case of Poast at the top of the list, 1474 instances decided to block it and prevent any new posts or comments from that instance showing up to their users.
Instances that aren't explicitly federated or defederated yet (unknown) are sort of in a limbo, they won't be seen at all by any users unless someone from either instance actively searches for a community from the other vir via a direct community link in the searchbox, then those server will follow (federate) with each other.
I hope that made sense, I'm trying to think of better ways to word this but I'm not sure if it's a good explanation or not.
To add, there's a toggle for Send as SMS in that same settings menu in the top comment, when that's enabled it'll automatically fallback to SMS when a message fails to send after a short delay.