ninjan

joined 2 years ago
[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 6 points 11 months ago

That's how you get a fancy new prion disease...

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 88 points 11 months ago (30 children)

Most homeless are in the big cities, most churches are out in the boonies. The homeless are very unlikely to accept being bussed to a flyover state to sleep in a church in bumfuck nowhere. For a myriad of reasons.

Keep in mind also that a lot of them have a very hard time accepting any help due to past trauma as well.

It's not a situation with a quick fix. Really the first step isn't even ensuring housing for the homeless, it's making sure we don't get more homeless. We likely can't save a subset of today's homeless because they don't want/or won't accept any help that comes with any strings (like no drugs or just they can't trash the place). But we can ensure no-one else ends up on the streets by beefing up mental healthcare and social services.

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't know why the article doesn't bring up Valve being the company to bring loot boxes and that business model to gaming as the prime example. Valve earns extreme money from the skins market and gambling in CSGO / CS2 since they sell the keys and take a cut of trades as well. They're far more concerned with money than actually caring for the people involved. Gambling ruins lives and Valve is the gambling company that faces by far the least vitriol in that horrendous crowd.

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 3 points 11 months ago (6 children)

I disagree because the biggest they did and continue to do is loot boxes. I argue that it was Valve that popularized that business model with CSGO and it is the most predatory shit that has ever entered the gaming sphere. It's a complete cancer and Valves implementation is amongst the worst there is because of their market giving the items easily accessible real money value. This makes it not just like gambling in my extremely firm opinion, it makes it actual gambling. They're also double dipping with the community market since it also takes a cut from aforementioned gambling. How Valve has escaped the vast majority of loot box hate is completely beyond me. And how they've managed to so far avoid a world wide crackdown on the unregulated gambling is also to me mind boggling. I despise Valve for this to the very core of my being because I know first hand how easily that shit can ruin lives and I know people that have got hooked and fucked up their life big time from CS skins. Left at the altar fucked up levels.

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Quick note though, one child is still far below replacement rate. Though you didn't state if you're one and done or not.

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 6 points 11 months ago

Someone who fucked up in one way or another. Anything that's not a security related incident with a CVE entry is bound to be a major oversight by someone. Remember over promising is a fuck up, not business as usual in a healthy organisation.

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

No I'm just against closing doors. This is a great example of the bare minimum being regulated due to safety and it's regulated to be something tried and tested, like anything safety related should be. While letting the market, i.e. us consumers decide on the other stuff. It's not the right solution to have politicians decide how a cars auxiliary functions should be operated.

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Was still talking about the safety stuff here. Like turn signals and hazard lights and the stuff the person above wanted added in climate controls etc

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Eugh. That feeling is the worst job related one. When you realize that you could've handled it within working hours but because you tried to dodge it you end up having to work overtime and mess up the family plans for the holiday...

Now-a-days I make damn sure someone I know is competent has the task assigned to them with ample time to fail and notify me without it leading to an all-nighter.

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 7 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Eh, I think this strikes the perfect balance where it ensures safety while not stifling innovation. Touchscreens are bad, and the consensus around that is growing. But the solution might not be a return to physical buttons, there are many possibilities and some might turn out easier and safer.

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, right, read to fast it seems! Though that still leaves the possibility of software firewalls, but any OOTB ones wouldn't be doing any packet inspection.

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 2 points 1 year ago

In my experience beepers tend to be very simple. My cheap B-board, but major brand (MSI), only beeps when it POSTs. If it doesn't post then there's nothing. Good for when you're using it headless but otherwise pretty pointless imo.

view more: ‹ prev next ›