Am I alone being against all forms of upscaling, and play everything on native resolution only? I always disable DLSS/FSR/XeSS
novacomets
joined 3 months ago
That's going to be a mass amount of porting. I'm not confident they can do it due to the difference in architecture and instruction sets. RISC V is a bit behind ARM for performance, and then to translate to Ryzen, I say that they are being too ambitious.
I never heard of Titan 3 before this post. It's would be no surprise if it turned out to be bogus.
A PCI-E 4x4 card would run on gen 3 at x4, cutting performance in half from a gen 4x4 connection.
CPU is not quite as critical for 1440p under 120fps. At 4K the CPU is almost irrelevent. There will be a difference from CPU but single but not a visual difference if it's at least on Haswell or Coffee Lake
A PCI-E 4.0x8 GPU in a 3.0 motherboard slot will run the GPU at 3.0x8 speeds.
How does Bazzite compare to Nobara?
Your commet was deleted before I could see it.
The 4060 and Ti is PCI-E 4.0x8 which equals PCI-E 3.0x16.
If base 5060 comes in PCI-E 5.0x16, that means it runs at full speed. I would buy that as a gift for someone.
If they run in PCI-E 5x16 and not x8, they will be a noticable upgrade over 4060.
All games work in 11. You will get the best picture quality for graphics on 11. More DX9 games work in 11 than worked in 10. Path tracing is best on 11. I have some games that are DVD installs, no game store launcher.
There are different Linux programs that address most Windows issues but not all. With Windows, you can install Win 11, install GPU driver, and start playing games. I do avoid using Steam due to their extortion, so eventually I find games that can't run on Linux.
So it was framed with an obvious bias instead of reporting observable information.
Intel needs to design 1 Core Ultra 9 and 1 Core Ultra 7 that is entirely made of P-cores, zero E-cores on the physical die, and watxh how much better those sell compared to all of the other ones.
Even though Intel isn't the fastest, the mix of having 2 different architectures designs with P-cores being from one design and E-cores being of a different architecture, it is affecting people's experience.
Intel can still compete against AMD 8-core non-x3D, but not with e-cores in the mix. For systems that run on on-board graphics from APU and will never have an nVidia/Radeon GPU installed, Intel rules all.
What's crippling Intel is their obsession on sales figures for stock market price and not raw performance to maintain mindshare. Oh, and leave a new CEO in power for a minimum of at least 5+ years to seeing the very beginning of the fruits of their work. Nothing gets fixed in 2 years. In took AMD 10 years to take Intel's sales and now Intel is falling off, that shows that the problem isinternal, and not due to competition. External competition only exposed the slop and filth of how Intel is structured and run since Intel is still not ready to start fighting off from being swallowed.