Thank you!
We have never come across one that is as easy to use as Signal and has no problems with encryption, either that it can have its encryption turned off, it breaks easily or that it makes dubious claims with few-no audits to back them up.
Plus the common person enjoys the fun features of Signal or other easy messengers, most decentralised messages do not have these features, are indefinitely working on them or make them not as easy to use, leading to most being uninterested in those messengers.
We have tried most if not all of them, than most and they are definitely lacking as much as we wish they were not. Decentralised encrypted (or partially encrypted) messengers always seem to have problems whether it's with their encryption, moderation tools, connectivity or the lack of other features.
The only real differences we can think of is:
Whatsapp unlike Signal doesn't have usernames meaning a phone number must be used to contact others on it, and that Whatsapp's report feature shares the unencrypted message and surrounding messages with Meta to give context for the report.
Honestly we have no idea. We hope it does or they are working on it though, if not perhaps an issue could be opened?
We believe Forgejo is a fork of Gitea by Codeberg.
The reason we see it as better than Gitea is because it's aiming for federation which is something very much needed in code repositories, we shouldn't have to sign up to multiple sites just to be able to help out with a project.
If Gitea has federation then let us know!
Edit: Also, Gitea is not really open source any more in spirit if not in license which is why the community tends to prefer Forgejo.
Kiki's drone destruction service.
Sure, we are happy to help!
It's a riff on the leopards eating people's faces party joke/meme/satire/sarcasm that goes something like "I can't believe they ate our faces" says person who voted for the face eating leopards party. It basically means (in the original), you get what you vote for and shouldn't be surprised when it happens.
Yes, we realised this after posting. Thank you for pointing it out!
Lol.
But also sighs at people who think they can be monogamous but can't and should just accept the fact that they should be polyamorous etc
Oh, that's yucky. Thanks for the information, we haven't used it since it got bought by Facebook.