pennomi

Oh for sure. But if (for example) an artist can save time by tracing over an SDXL reference image, that is energy-efficient as well as time-efficient, despite most people claiming the contrary.

Not only are they cheaper than AC, but doing the math shows that they are more energy efficient than a human doing the same work, since humans operate at around 80-100W, 24 hours a day. (Assuming that the output is worth anything, of course.)

Yes the far side of the moon is colloquially (and incorrectly) called the dark side of the moon. Thanks for the correction.

The dark side of the moon is shielded from the planet’s radio by the whole moon. So it’s a pretty attractive place to set up.

Plus, several candidate craters have favorable geometry for a massive radio telescope.

It truly is one of my favorite proposals.

I still think they should build out a lunar crater radio telescope out there on the dark side of the moon. The radio silence and scale would be impossible to get any other way.

That’s both the strength and horror of LLMs. They are super good at presenting information in a pleasing way to the user… but can you trust that what it says is correct?

To the majority of humans, a pleasing presentation is treated as evidence of truth, despite that being a logical fallacy.

It’s not a normal choice of game controller but people have played games with weirder.

Not sure if you’re new to this or what, but money buys a shitton of power in the US, and Musk has plenty of money.

Not necessarily, but everyone having access to cheap labor AND raw materials would ensure that.

Now I’m not going to pretend that AI is anywhere close to being a source of cheap labor. It really can’t do much without a human to assist it.

I’m not entirely sure of that. While corporate AI would certainly cause that, right now there are open weights models which can be run on a relatively affordable computer, and they are not that far behind. These models are able to democratize AI benefits rather than concentrate it.

Oh for sure, but what I’m saying is that the message is “don’t be satisfied doing housework, you’re a princess even if you don’t know it” which subverts the stereotypical expectation they set up in the first act.

I actually think it’s the other way around. Their initial responsibility is one of traditional gender roles, but they all throw that away and become something far beyond what society expected of them.