pevrert

I'd argue you are a vegan if you eat chicken for profit though, because again labels aren't religion. There's no score being kept, no penalty applied to you or your veganism because you ate chicken. The moment you stop eating chicken, you're vegan. Life isn't all or nothing, and it's detrimental to think it is.

Again this isn't religion, there is no cosmic scoresheet that is tallying your purity. If you suck a thousand dicks and then decide after #1001 that you're straight, fuck it, you're straight, who the fuck is anyone to say otherwise? There's just no benefit to thinking or living life like there's some outsider tallying your score that you have to appease if you want to identify as a whatever.

That's totally cool, obviously whatever you feel is what you feel and that's right, I am not trying to convince you otherwise.

But there is a mountain of difference between "I've never been attracted to penis" and "If you’re prepared to change your sexuality for money then your sexuality was a scam in the first place," which is all my point has ever been.

Don't suck dick because you don't want to suck dick, not because doing so will betray some kind of concept of "straight" upon which you are defining yourself, you know?

If my partner passed on the opportunity to dramatically improve our station in life beyond any of our reasonable dreams, I wouldn't consider that "staying true to me," tbh.

People were fucking in all variety of combinations long before the concepts of "straight" or "gay" even existed. "Straight" isn't a thing, it's a means of describing a pattern, that's it. Language doesn't define human activity, human activity invokes language in an attempt to characterize it.

I guess it depends on why you want to do it, doesn't it? Do you want to do it because you are questioning your attractions and potential sexuality? Yeah that's probably bi-curious. Do you just have some sort of intellectual curiosity? A desire to understand the appeal rather than explore your personal interest? Is somebody offering you $20 to do it? For any of those, I think it's less black-and-white.

But what I think most and most importantly, is those labels benefit us when we wish to group, find commonality, or define preferences, so they have merit, but they do us disservice when they limit us or restrict our agency to that which we can define into convenient simplifications. So like, don't not use them or anything (do you want, basically always), just don't sanctify them. In the same way that virginity is mostly a construct, sexuality is too.

And I'll be honest, I wasn't expecting the "I can't suck because if I did I'd probably turn into the most voracious glizzy guzzler in history" response, so fuck if I know anymore if my little soapbox statement even applies to the situation at hand tbh, but I do think we sanctify, to our detriment, way too much in modern society, definitely including a lot involving sex and sexuality.

And no, I'm not gifted with brevity, I'm sorry.

edit: oh you are dude, my bad. I got confused somehow.

I'm not sure I'm that interested in performing it in real life, and it's not exactly what you're talking about, but creampie cleanup cuckolding videos are basically the hottest thing in terms of pornography. Even beyond that I think watching a woman swallowing is 10x hotter than a facial or any other kind of cumshot, so yeah, cum consumption is a pretty sexy idea in general.

Well the nipple covers are just pasties, they have skin-safe adhesive on one side.

But I think they're just there to make the image "decent" and not a part of the product (I got this image from a lingerie store website) which is the cupless bra - and to be clear it's the cupless bra I think is sexy, not the pasties (which don't do anything for me)

Or maybe sexuality isn't the unshakable sacred pillar you think it is? You can be 100% straight and decide you just want to go suck some dicks just to see what the experience is like; you'll still be straight.

Sexuality isn't religion; we don't have to be needlessly dogmatic about it.

Depends on the price and the cock, tbh.

I'd suck Isaiah Maxwell beautiful shlong for less money than some random ugly chode, for instance.

Varies wildly, but in general I’d say best-case scenario, for me, is lingerie that highlights the nudity, such as a shelf or cupless bra/lingerie.

I'll preface this by saying that penis is not my primary interest, but I can enjoy a great pic if the equipment is exceptional and do have opinions on the topic 😅

Personally I prefer more body (at least chest and legs) over close-up, no clothes or underwear only (ideally boxer briefs), 3/4 angle facing, erect, large. Bonus points for artsy photography, and well-lit black and white is nice.