Where as we know our money is ours
I agree with the sentiment of your comment but you should look into this. You don't really own money that is in accounts.
plyth
joined 3 weeks ago
You don’t pay any commission
In the same way that Google and Facebook are free.
Especially because of the fact plenty of them are rigged.
Arguably the safer bet if one wants to gamble is stock investing
Haven't you seen Wolf of Wallstreet? How do you avoid paying commissions and how do you get information before the big players have already cashed in?
Imagine spending $250m dollars to get deported.
As others have said: $43 billion. Elon bought Twitter.
How is the guilt established? And how could it be undone?
Easy. It's a long name but you can rename onedrive accordingly.
Like the other comment says, it must be the New START treaty, but I am no expert. It seems like it's a Russian excuse for their carelessness however some parts of the treaty were respected so I think Putin and Trump had some topics to clarify.
On 21 February 2023, Russia suspended its participation in New START.[8] However, it did not withdraw from the treaty, and clarified that it would continue to abide by the numerical limits in the treaty.
On 2 June 2024, the United States revoked visas of Russian nuclear inspectors, describing this step as a "lawful countermeasure" to Russia's "ongoing violations" of the treaty.
So some parts of the treaty must have been considered active.
On 1 June 2025, Ukraine claimed to have destroyed more than a dozen nuclear strategic bombers, including two Tu-160, at airfields deep inside Russia with swarms of small drones. The bombers were still parked not in nuclear strike protective bunkers, but in open-air, according to obligations under the New START Treaty with the US.
He can legally be president for a third term
Has the law already been changed?
The issue is that because of nuclear treaties between USA and Russia, Russia is required to park their nuclear bombers out in the open. If USA wants Russia to keep them out in the open, they had to make a good argument.
They evaluate reality with other priorities. To them it seems like they are doing good.
Almost all cruelties are committed for the greater good. People just disagree on what is good.
This explains the ignorance of global warming perfectly.
view more: next ›
Are there other headlines right now that receive less airtime while this appointment is discussed?