redtea

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Also, YouTube ads are about the most random things. I don't think I've ever seen an ad on YouTube for anything that I would actually buy. I'm not even nearly immune to ads, either. Show me a product that solves a problem for me and I'll strongly consider it. Consciously and I'm sure subconsciously.

Google knows what I do for a living, where I live, and what I spend money on. Google also knows that I use YouTube primarily to watch videos in other languages. It's not a secret to them. Yet they insist on trying to sell me products or services that have zero relevance to anything that I do. In English.

It makes me wonder if they're even trying to profit through ads. I know the answer – no, not really – the advertiser is the customer, not me. It must be too complicated for them to realise that they could charge more for ads the more sales they led to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I disagree that a flop means lost revenue. This is an industry that's so adept at hiding income to avoid paying taxes, actors, and every other studio worker that dodgy accounting is known as 'Hollywood Accounting'. Maybe we're talking about different things. When I say Hollywood, I mean the movie industry as a whole.

Hollywood has failed to capture some income streams. From theatres, for example, as you say. But there's still too much money to be made (and too much propaganda potential) for enough big money to leave that the problems of monopoly finance capital go away.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Good point. And it's a lot easier to accept 'failure' (there could still be something learned in a game that doesn't quite hit the mark) if the budget isn't astronomical.

There are games like FFXV that get quite creative on a big budget. (Not sure if it's AAA.) I enjoyed that game but some of the novel features bugged me a little bit and they skimped on some important features, I thought. Maybe there's a better formula for trialling novelty than an all or nothing approach.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I can't remember who it was. A famous actor, anyway. They were talking about what's happened with movies. There's nothing in the middle.

It's either $100m+ or less than $3m. Either it gets a big producer and they pump so much money into it that it must be safe because it can't lose money. Or is a small producer doing it for the love, but a small budget doesn't go very far. The risky narratives done well would be funded somewhere between the two extremes but it's just not how it's done anymore.

In a strange way, to get more money in for the riskier productions, we need to get the money out of Hollywood. Can't see it happening, myself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

We live distinctly under capitalism. No need for any other names that obscure that relation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's partly because 'tankies' read theory. Liberal theory, Marxist theory, all of it that they can get their hands on. According to both liberal and Marxist theory, liberalism is the main ideology of capitalism. When 'tankies' oppose 'liberals', they are talking about the 'progressive' left of the Anlgo-European empire and what that 'left' calls 'conservatives'. So if conservatives laugh when 'tankies' make fun of liberals, the joke's on them because the 'tankie' means them, too.

There is absolutely no defence of fascism from 'tankies'. That term usually refers to Marxist-Leninists, who praise Stalin and Mao for their stances against fascism, colonialism, and imperialism. If nothing else (and there is a lot 'else'), anti-fascism is a central tenet of 'tankie' ideology and practice. Anti-fascism is/was a core tenet of all Marxist parties. If you think that a 'tankie' is 'defending fascism', you have misunderstood what they are saying and/or have inferred something from their words that they did not intend. Horseshoe theory is an intellectually bankrupt 'theory'.

You are right about this:

We are inherently a position of compromise[.]

As Mao said:

… liberalism rejects ideological struggle and stands for unprincipled peace, thus giving rise to a decadent, Philistine attitude and bringing about political degeneration[.]

This and the other types of liberalism are often what 'tankies' are challenging when they criticise 'liberals'—not what counts as 'liberal' in the extremely narrow US electoral politics sense of the term.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Marxism is dialectical and historical materialism. It is the analysis of contradictory and internally-connected relations and processes. To detach NATO from the actions of its member states is anti-dialectical.

Additionally, as you say, words have meanings. When people criticise NATO it is as a stand-in for the imperialist world order. It includes the IMF, World Bank, the WTO, the 'international' courts and rules, and all their elements and capitalist lackeys. You're making a semantic argument, which misses the crucial point: that NATO and its member states are concerned only with the wealth and power of their bourgeoisie, regardless of Russia.

I'm not trying to hide the fact that I have an agenda, that we can't have world peace until there are no more imperialists, which includes and is often, in ordinary language, represented by NATO. If you interpret that as support for Russia, there's not much left for us to discuss.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

They are left-unity. That means some are communists but others are of other ideologies e.g. anarchism. So no, they are not saying 'fuck you if you aren't a communist' because that would alienate half their user-base. The 'left' is much broader than whatever counts as the 'left' in the US (which mostly isn't 'left' but only 'left of… XYZ').

Do you not think it's a bit ironic to say that they're unwilling to debate or reason in the context of dotworld defederating before there's any chance of engagement? If there's anyone unwilling to debate and reason it's those who made and support this decision to defederate before they have to suffer the indignity of debating and reasoning with even more people with views contrary to liberalism.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You can pretend that NATO member states are separate from NATO if you like but we can't really continue a conversation if you think the people behind NATO are not also the same people behind the wars and/or embargoes of the above states. Just because the swap the mask every now and then doesn't mean it's a different actor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I fear that we have reached an impasse in this conversation already. To continue talking would risk talking past one another. All I can do is proffer this meagre offering: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2451jFeZp0

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's the kind of ableism that would get someone banned on Hexbear or any instance that cared about inclusivity and opposed bigotry.

Edit: I can see how it would create a lot of extra work for dotworld mods to have to deal with all the reports if they federated with Hexbear and had to deal with an influx of people who call out bigotry and stand for justice. (Scrolling down, I see this offending comment isn't the only one in this thread.)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

World peace would be a step close, for a start.

 

Someone curious asked:

Do you know of any resources where I can hear the options of average Soviet citizens during the time of the USSR?

I linked Dessaline's GitHub page: https://dessalines.github.io/essays/socialism_faq.html#did-the-citizens-of-the-soviet-union-dislike-their-government.

And I suggested Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds but I don't think it quite fits the description.

Can anyone think of other resources, maybe a peoples' history kind of thing?

1
Parallel text creator (phraseotext.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr)
 

I've not used this yet, but it could be useful for creating parallel texts for Spanish learners.

 

El conflicto ucraniano desenmascara a Occidente.

Rusia sigue luchando por la formación de un nuevo orden mundial justo, en el que terminará con la dictadura de Estados Unidos y surgirán nuevos polos de fuerza del mundo multipolar; y uno de ellos será la América Latina. …

No es nada nueva la política estadounidense de sabotear a los gobiernos soberanos, autónomos que no se les arrodillan, ¡revisemos la historia! durante la Guerra fría por ejemplo, Washington financió a los rebeldes radicales en la América Latina y participó activamente en el derrocamiento de los gobiernos latinoamericanos electos legítimamente, principalmente aquellos que colaboraron con La Unión soviética. Para esa fecha, la casa Blanca exhibía públicamente y sin pudor su ambición, convertir nuestro continente en su patio trasero y controlar rigurosamente todos los procesos que se desarrollan en la región. …

Una vez más la crisis de Ucrania demostró la arrogancia y el descaro de la política exterior de los Estados Unidos y el gran desprecio que sienten por los intereses legítimos de los estados. Sus intentos de mantener la dominación mundial tuvieron efecto contrario y provocaron el surgimiento de los nuevos centros de poder en la arena internacional y evidentemente entre ellos los países de América Latina.

 

"Entre los días 5 al 10 de junio de 1967 las fuerzas sionistas, atacaron a los ejércitos de Egipto, Siria, Irak y Jordania bajo el pretexto, que las fuerzas egipcias apostadas en la península del Sinaí representaban un peligro para Israel. …"

('apostadas' significa 'posted'/'stationed')

Este artículo debe ser bastante comprensible para Marxistas aun si ya no logró un nivel alto en español.

Algunos cuestiones para otro aprendices de español:

  1. ¿Que sucede en Asia Occidental en mil novecientos sesenta y siete?
  2. ¿Quiénes eran los beligerantes?
  3. ¿Que significa 'tergiversar'? (Lenin también usa mucho este palabra.)
  4. ¿Qué te gusta o no gusta de este artículo?

Hispanohablantes, sentir bienvenidos a responder también.

(Feel free to correct my Spanish.)

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I've wanted to go over to Linux for a long time but I have no idea how to go about it. I hear about incompatibility problems with hardware and all the different options for different Linux OS's and that's it, I forget about it for a while to avoid the headache.

So where do I start? I don't even know how to choose hardware or what to look for. The number of options with Linux makes things a little confusing.

And although others here have answered the question before, I'm unsure what I have to do to stay 'safe' on Linux. Are there extra steps or is it just the standard, don't open dodgy links and turn off Java script in the PDF viewer kind of thing? Does Linux come with a trustworthy firewall/antivirus/malware detection? Is there a chance of Linux e.g. sending my passwords, etc, to someone or just letting someone into my harddrive? I hear that 'open source' means people can check the code but how do I know if someone has checked the code—I wouldn't know what to look for myself.

I followed the Linux subreddit but the users the can be rather… enthusiastic, which is great, but I need something far more basic to get started lol.

Is there a good step-by-step guide somewhere? Or can anyone give me some pointers/tips/advice?

I mainly browse, type, and read pdfs and other text files. No gaming, although I wouldn't be opposed to it. No need to be mobile; laptops are terrible for my back so I always use an external monitor, anyway, so I won't be using it 'on the go'.

Edit: Thanks for all the advice. I got a machine up and running from a bootable USB.

Any others who read the comments here because they're interested in trying out Linux – if you have Windows installed and want to keep it on your HDD/SSD, partition your drive within Windows. Then boot from the USB. You can partition your drive (and keep Windows) from the bootable USB but it's a bit more complicated and it makes it harder to create a swap partition and a storage partition. I had to go back and forth a few times to figure this out.

 

Este orador es claro si quieres escuchar una defensa de Stalin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXzWMIRngGU

¿Que piensas?

(Habladores nativos: es aceptable usar "piensas" aqui en sitio de "piensa usted"?)

 

¿Cualquiera ha leído Sidi por Arturo Pérez-Reverte? Yo fue disfrutandola pero la historia tornó islamófobo de repente y luego se fue arruinar para mi. No lo sé si continuar con el libro.

Entonces yo busqué sus nombre y 'islamofobia' y retornó un artículo – sobre otra obra de él – cuyo introducción explicarlo perfectamente (https://www.laizquierdadiario.com/La-historia-de-Europa-segun-Perez-Reverte-una-leccion-de-ignorancia-islamofobia-y-neocolonialismo). Él utiliza

la lógica binaria "salvaje - civilizado", que tanto sirvió para deshumanizar a las gentes racializadas desde los tiempos de la explotación colonial, y para marginar y/o expulsar a todos aquellos que no cumplían con la "normalidad" …

Pero la "normalidad" de este libro parece europeos cristianos (y quizás los blancos).

¿Cualquiera has encontraste algo similar con otras novelas?

¿Es tan decepcionando, no?

(Si hay errores en mi español, correctalo si te quieras, pero no hace falta si no quieres.)

 

Hello Deplorable Spanish-learning Tankies.

I want to draw your attention to The Linguistics of Spanish.

If you are learning Spanish, you may find it useful to read up on the linguistics. The following link gives

"information and analysis on the following subjects:

  • the pronunciation of standard European Spanish
  • variation in the Spanish-speaking world
  • aspects of Spanish syntax
  • the history of Spanish"

This website is very useful for helping you understand the sounds of Spanish, to better understand / parse what you hear, and how to improve your accent. The section on phonemes and minimal pairs is especially helpful.

Minimal pairs will help you learn to distinguish the different sounds in Spanish. These allow you to learn what each letter sounds like when it is next to each other letter.

Once you read the theory, you can search Youtube for audio examples. You can also practice speaking the minimal pairs if you struggle with any of them, although I advise you to listen first and lots to ensure that you are practicing the correct sound. Some minimal pair examples:

paso, peso, piso, poso, puso

And:

capa, cata, caca, cava, cada, caga, caza, casa, etc

Do any of you other Spanish learners / speakers have any other useful suggestions for learning about Spanish linguistics?

Any tips on pronouncing the 'lr' sound in e.g. 'alrededor' will be welcome!

 

I used the listening-reading method to learn Spanish (or to jump-start my Spanish, anyway). I thought I would post the link to the method and make some suggestions for books to read for others.

Listening-reading, by aYa/Phi-Staszek

What is Listening-Reading (LR)?

LR is a method. Read a book in English and listen to it in Spanish at the same time.§

§ Or any other target language.

This sounds difficult / impossible, but it works, and it gets easier with practice.

The trick is to read a sentence in English then listen to the Spanish. This is possible because you can (probably) read a lot faster than people can speak.

This is a rather efficient method because it exposes you to a lot of (comprehensible) words per minute.

You're supposed to use parallel texts. There are some here to get you started: Farkas Translations. You could also find the PDFs in English and Spanish for the same book. Or you could look here: Bilingual Fiction – warning: http link.

Personally, I prefer just to use a physical copy of the English book.

For the first 2-250 hours of LRing (see below), you want to use a few long books, which you will listen to more than once. aYa suggests 3 times. So you might LR a 33 hour book three times, which equals 100 hours.

Do the same for a second book, and you will likely be able to listen to the third book without relying on the English, especially if these are three (or more books) in the same series, by the same author (like Ken Follett: see below). (You may have to just listen to the third book twice or three times, but you will not need the English translation.)

Notes

aYa recommends 12 hour days over three weeks to jump from knowing only a summary of the grammar to reaching 'natural listening' (i.e. enjoying native content without (much) help).

'Natural listening' does not mean that you will understand everything, but you should understand enough to follow along, especially Marxist lectures (the content will be familiar to Lemmygradders; plus, anything in formal Spanish is easier to understand for native English speakers because formal English (as with formal Spanish) still mostly rely on words with Latin roots, and these formal words have not changed much).

(Enrique Dussel's lectures are easy enough to follow.)

LRing for 2+ hours per day works, too, although it will then take a little longer (i.e. a couple of months rather than 3 weeks) to enjoy native content without help (it still takes 2–250 hours of LRing to get to 'natural listening', so divide 250 by LR-hours-per-day for a rough estimate of how long it would take you).

Personally, I find I get into the flow after about an hour. And after that hour, it's like I'm in a new zone where Spanish just makes sense. So the longer 'chunks' that you can manage, the better. Probably.

I would not recommend jumping in without knowing much / any grammar, because knowing some grammar will help to make the audio more comprehensible. But, going back to more complex grammar explanations is a lot easier after doing LR and some reading.

Tips and Tricks

If you are a slower reader, you can read one page / paragraph first with the audio paused (so you know what is happening), then LR the same page / paragraph. Work out what works for you. When you start out, you may want to try this way first (reading a page at a time before LRing the same page) while you get the hang of it.

It helps to pick the right book. The link above includes 'levels' of books. You may want to start at the beginning and work your way up. Know, however, that the longer the book, the easier this will be. Because after 20–50 pages, you will have already encountered the most used words in the book. So the longer the book, the more repetition you will hear of words that you have already (partially) understood.

As for learning enough grammar to make the most out of LRing, start simple. Use the brief grammar explanations in the middle of / at the start / end of a Spanish-English dictionary. Or take a look at a phrase book.

Books that I enjoyed LRing

As for choosing a book to LR, Sally Rooney's Gente Normal (Normal People) is nicely narrated and a great novel. As is Dónde Estás, Mundo Bello (Beautiful World, Where are You). Rooney is a Marxist, too, and it comes through subtly in her writing.

Ken Follett's Las Tinieblas y el Alba (The Evening and the Morning) and Los Pilares de la Tierra (Pilars of the Earth) are good. Both narrated by Jordi Boixaderas, who is great. If you enjoy the books, there are two more in the series (I haven't read these yet). These novels talk about feudal England, which provides some useful vocabulary for those who want to jump into Marxist texts.

And if you get used to Boixaderas' voice, you may find it easier to then follow up with something by Isabel Allende as he narrates some of her work (Largo Pétalo de la Mar (Long Petal of the Sea – i.e. Chile) for example).

Another audiobook that was pleasant to LR was Phillip Pullman's El Libro de la Oscuridad I: La Bella Salvaje (The Book of Dust I: La Belle Sauvage).

Conclusion

aYa wrote:

I believe in learning a huge bit every minute. Plenty of people can drive a car. L-R is Formula One. Now you know what to expect.

And:

The most important things happen in your head. Your emotions, your memories, the way you think, what you already know, they are all holographic, everything happens at once. You cannot show or describe how you really learn. You can only write about some tricks or tools, and that’s about it.

This is not magic, but it does work, and it's quite enjoyable because you can jump straight into content that you could otherwise enjoy in English. You will likely need to study some grammar afterwards, especially if Spanish is your first second language. And it still takes a long time to become 'fluent' (whatever that means). But LR seems to speed up the process of getting to an intermediate level. It did for me, anyway.

I'm happy to answer questions, although you may find most of your questions answered in the website that aYa wrote in the link, above.

Hope this helps someone.

 

Who are your favourite Spanish-speaking artists?

I quite like Rosalía, especially her newer music. I have heard people say she is guilty of cultural appropriation, but I'm unclear on the whole story there, and my Spanish is not good enough to understand all her lyrics (i.e. if the reactionary lyrics are obvious but I'm missing their meaning).

Ana Tijoux is good, too. Revolutionary-adjacent music, so far as I can work out. She is French-Chilean. Her parents had to flee Pinochet.

Any revolutionary artists I should try? Hip hop or rap especially. Immortal Technique is great but there's generally too much English in his songs to use them to improve my Spanish.

view more: ‹ prev next ›