roscoe

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They made a movie about that guy. Don't watch it, it's awful. It was all a misunderstanding. The Jesus is actually a good dude.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Because an entertainer/athlete gets a paycheck for doing a job. They're not getting rich underpaying employees.

The debatable part comes in when you get more nuanced than that: The richest of them probably derive most of their wealth from investments once they've accumulated enough capital. Their industry requires the efforts of many underpaid people (even if they don't directly get a say in that). Anyone that keeps (not just earns) a billion wakes up every morning and decides not to solve homelessness in their city. Etc.

But a 20mm paycheck to put asses in seats is a paycheck, not exploitation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

While I am a bit of a misanthrope, I do stop short of referring to people as cargo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's always hard to judge AoA unless you're looking side-on with a horizon for reference, but excessive nose-up attitude caused by cargo incorrectly loaded or not secured properly so it shifted aft during rotation could have caused an aerodynamic stall.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I guess it's true, money can't buy taste.

Fun fact: Alec Baldwin's character was invented for the movie to provide exposition. The filmmakers didn't trust movie-going audiences to pick up the information from the three conversations that occur at the beginning of the play.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I see a lot of these postmortems and I don't know what combination of them is the actual truth, but I wasn't the slightest bit surprised when she lost. As soon as she got the nomination I thought it was likely.

For what it's worth, here is my take on her as one Californian that's had to deal with her since before 2010 when she ran for attorney general:

  • Even before she ran for attorney general, I was constantly hearing about all kinds of awful stuff the SF district attorney's office was doing under her leadership even though I'm not from SF county.
  • I was very disappointed when she got the nomination for attorney general because I didn't want her policies applied statewide. I voted against her in the primary but of course I held my nose and voted for her over the R in the general.
  • I don't recall who I voted for in the 2016 primary for Senate but it wasn't her, or blue dog Sanchez. I think I barely tilted toward Sanchez in the general but I honestly can't remember. I was so disappointed in those choices that I didn't really give a shit. I thought we could do better in California than two conserva-dems, especially with the top-2 primary system.
  • Never even considered voting for that cop in a presidential primary.
  • Didn't like that she was the bottom of the ticket in 2020 especially considering Biden's age, but the alternative was clear.
  • Of course, due to the alternative I voted for her in 2024 but without one iota of enthusiasm. I think I may have been more enthused to vote for John fucking Kerry, but that was a long time ago, it's hard to remember my feelings for a block of wood.

A small silver lining to her losing is I'll never have to hold my nose and vote for her ever again.

She lost because she just sucks. Whether an individual's reason for thinking she sucks and not being excited about her was based on misogyny, racism, her record of public service, her policy goals, or her personality doesn't matter. I didn't know anybody excited to vote for her. I knew some people excited to vote for a WOC, but not her as a person. A little enthusiasm was what was needed to turn the tide in the three states that mattered this time.

As soon as Biden dropped out too late for an actual primary, we already lost.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm not saying your opinion isn't valid or anything, I'm just curious. Are you the right age? Were you in high school or close when it came out? And I don't just mean when you watched it, were you that age at the time the movie was set? As an adolescent a few years younger than the characters at the time, it resonated with me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I get it, I liked it but it was kind of up it's own ass, but that recurring gag about the general asking for money for free snacks was great. There was one scene toward the end in particular that was all serious then Jennifer Lawrence brought it up that killed me.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dude, I don't want to downvote an opinion, but this one is fucking hard.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In that vein, Uncut Gems with Adam Sandler. Great performance, but if you have anxiety issues you might want to skip it, it's a bit of a rough watch. But you should definitely watch his acceptance speech for a Film Independent Spirit award.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I have no response or defence for that. You're right. All I can say is, although I'm more of a drama guy, that movie had me in stitches beginning to end.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I think they're harbingers of death also. If you hear them, someone is going to die.

 

I apologize in advance of this is too basic a question for this community.

I just learned about lexisnexis and went to their website to request my report, opt out of everything I could, and request my information be deleted.

Are there any other companies like this I should be aware of so I can make the same requests there?

If it matters, I'm in California and it's my understanding that I have a few more rights concerning this sort of thing than some others do.

view more: next ›