royal_starfish

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Add logarithms to that

And calculus

And (a+b)²=a²+2ab+b²

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Laughs in good public transit(rail based is based, but buses are good too), where it can achieve 10~100x the capacity in the same footprint

With rail, as long as you have a good timetable and a robust signaling system, 27tpdph with multiple service patterns is achievable, and >33tpdph if you run just one service pattern, all while having a top speed of 120km/h and an average speed of >50km/h

Railway in general (excluding Line-of-sight based light rail and trams) can move stupendous amounts of people at full speed really quickly due to signaling and mass transit inherently being more efficient in general

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well technically we can group things and do maths and we also have scientific notation, so there's also that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Pretty sure you could edit them in windows too?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Pretty sure he meant cheapest used

A p7p used goes for around US$400 here

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I could actually "feel" my body turning off but then I notice it and move which makes me fully awake again and I have to wait for myself to fall asleep again

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Try to use "request desktop site", stuff may be sized weirdly, but at least you don't get that stupid pop up anymore

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

It is both, but the pressure one contributes more to lift. You can see this when a wing stalls, the airflow separates from the upper surface and the pressure difference is gone. The angle of a stalled wing still means air is directed downwards, but the overall lift is much smaller.

At least that is what I've been told anyways

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Makes me wonder, what if they just let it sit for another 20 years and then recapture the helium to sell it or something?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

You forgot about the fact that buses have bigger windows and the passengers inside them, kids in this case, have smaller mass. Therefore I would argue that the chances of ejection are not less than a typical car.

Plus, pretty sure those old big muscle cars and luxury cars had more mass than a typical family hatchback and guess why we still got seatbelts?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

The main reason for tank crews(at least the commander) to open their hatches is not for ventilation, but for visibility and situational awareness.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

cough cough one pedal driving cough cough

view more: next ›