This comment has such a "Wanted to do X for a laugh? We had a tool for that, it's called Y" energy, and I think that's hilarious.
rustydrd
Reptiles don't have sexual dimorphism?
"I used to be a wizardry student like you. But then I took an arrow in the knee"
A Hobbit's passionate speech about the different ways you can cook a potato? Fan favorite.
It's funny because his real name is Bruce Banner.
Close enough.
IDK, all this "quoting other people's work" business seems mighty intellectual to me. Really smart people are outside of academia, where they think of smart stuff all on their own. /s
50 minutes late due to a door malfunction.
Even in Germany, far-right sentiments are pretty strongly related to people's level of education and economic opportunities.
As a general rule, if you want long-term wealth inequality, make sure your people are about as dumb as they are poor.
Very important point, just one technical remark, because I see this a lot: You don't necessarily want or need random samples in surveys. What you want is a probability sample, which means that you know the probability with which a person enters the sample. A random sample is a special type of probability sample, where each person has the same probability to enter the sample.
The large sample used for this "survey" in the OP is a convenience sample, which is a non-probability sample, where the persons' probabilities to enter the sample are simply unknown. And this is often not a useful basis for a survey, because it's affected by all sorts of response biases that are difficult to adjust for in non-probability samples.
*blinks horizontally*