scbasteve7

Yeah, good point.

Hence the question mark. It was more of a sarcastic statement than anything. But again, I rather know he's a pervert than him do it in the shadows. The devil you know is better than the one you don't. I want heinous people to be openly heinous so I know I'm supposed to object to them.

Not to mention that a huge and popular segment on his show is to entirely reduce women down to sex figures (regardless of their position or fame) by making them sit on a sex toy for the interview.

Guy is just a pervert and is very open about it. Which, respect? I guess it's better than the devil you don't know. But yeah, he's very gross towards women. Treats them like their only purpose in life is sexual pleasure.

Literally everything by Cleopatrick and Primitive by not enough space

I was on the same boat as you forever. I came back to ow2 late last year. I'll say this. OW feels better than it ever has. Very balanced and very fair, while maintaining that very chaotic and energized feeling. They added tiered perks which really break up the monotony of the game, and also brought back loot boxes.

It feels like they realized the game became stagnant, and they're doing as much as they can to bring it back to peak, and past that.

They also are bringing back 'classic overwatch", and I'll say this... After you play classic and go back to regular you can feel the difference. The only thing I miss is 6v6 but it seems like that's coming back soon too

Bugs are fucking weird.

Murder is highly illegal. Treason is highly illegal. I think non permanent vandalism and possible defamation is only mildly illegal

It's okay if he uses that word, he has the pass. The ivermectin really set his IQ below Forest Gump levels.

Being an asshole.

Could be paying an arm and a leg. He already paid with his leg, doesn't realize that the arms next. Also why he's still optimistic. Doesn't realize that the worst of it hasn't even happened yet. (Also the artist might have just not known how to draw him chained up like the rest with just one arm)

I think the difference here, is that you're not talking about a collective, but instead two different individuals. I agree with OP on this one, and I think "guys" can refer to a collective of humans.

Is it right? Probably not. Do I think of just a bunch of men when someone says "come on guys"? Not really.