setInner234

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

9am-9pm, 6 days a week.

I'm a 10am-4pm, 4 days a week kind of person myself, however.

It's the same bullshit pushed by anyone exploiting labor for their own gain.

Ultimately, you can't blame predatory psychopaths for being predatory psychopaths. You can only blame those who let them get away with it.

And that's all of us :)

(Oh and when I say let them get away with it, I mean: celebrate them, make them into statues, teach all of our children that only money and power matters and do whatever it takes to become just like them, in exchange for all humanity and dignity we could have had instead)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Same boat club.

Honestly I've reached the point that I hope climate change, that's presently accelerating, fucks our species shit up to the core and forces our species to start again, because existing like this, subsisting for a tiny group of proud monsters that see us as livestock in perpetuity, sounds like most people will be born into damnation going forward, and as much pain as civilization level collapse would be, it pales in comparison to this system persisting and finding new cruelties to profit from for generations.

Human civilization in its current form seems to exist to find new efficiencies with which to torture most of humanity. Maybe we'd be better off knocked back to depending on one another in smaller groups. Maybe we'd find empathy again. Maybe our planet could start to recover from our damage

Yeah, you're not alone. I've basically become an anti-natalist. I don't think the ruling / owning class will budge unless their lives are affected. And that won't happen until there's no more slaves to support their insane lifestyles.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Summed up concisely. I've unfortunately given up hope that anything can be done or can improve. It feels the fight, whatever fight there ever was, has been lost.

 

Hope Ethan is ok

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I've always drawn the dividing line between people who have to work and people who choose to work. The latter can spend every waking moment of their lives ensuring that the former never, ever become one of them. And it sure looks they are succeeding. If the survival of mankind hinges on rich people willingly giving up ANY of their wealth at all, then mankind will perish. To a rich person, giving up wealth is no different than someone suggesting to you that they need to cut your nose, ears and limbs off to save humanity. You'd say no to that as well. In fact, you'd do anything to avoid this scenario. And while you're slaving away for a minimum wage that should be $25, and quibble over trans rights, the rich laugh into their fists, watching as you still don't seem to have realised that the bargaining power would be in your hands if you could just unite for a fucking second.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I don't know why you're being downvoted. Safety is my number 1 concern. The amount of times I've had to avoid dodgy / unsafe situations on public transport is crazy. Finally getting a car was the best decision ever. Until they make public transport safe, I'm not on it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Above all: to never have to work again Stretch goal: be stupidly rich and then dedicate my resources to ensuring that there are strict limits on the amount of money / power any one person can have

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Excellent point. I completely agree and should have perhaps put more emphasis on the fact that these practices are of course egregious and the onus should not just be on the user. There should be more public awareness of these privacy nightmares, however. Somehow people need to learn to start caring about this stuff, because if nobody uses Facebook, Facebook doesn't have the power to act the way it does.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Has that ever been independently verified? I remember the WhatsApp founders quit over FB policy to use messages for advertising, but perhaps they've changed course on that. You're right, the metadata alone would be insanely valuable.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

I've worked in advertising for a decade and, while on the one hand, the industry indeed tries to track your every move, it's rarely done well or in a coordinated fashion. Ever wonder why it's still not possible to switch off ads for products you've already bought? Online advertising is mostly blind spam, which is why you will be advertised the thing you've just bought ad nauseam. If they had these ultra-accurate profiles of everyone, they'd advertise you something you haven't bought. Using a basic adblocker instantly kills 99% of an advertiser's ability to publicly gather your data. It gets more complicated in the walled gardens: Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Microsoft etc. have an unbelievable amount of information about you, but they don't willingly share this. They use it to milk you within their walled gardens (do note, that in order to avoid Meta, you cannot use Threads, Instagram, any of their hardware, Facebook or WhatsApp).

Ultimately, it's still your choice whether you let them surveil you and it turns out people give these rights up willingly.

If you have an Alexa, it's your fault that Amazon can spy on everything your family says. If you've given WhatsApp your mobile number, then it's your fault that Facebook can read and analyse everything you've said to anyone on WhatsApp, connected to a near-perfectly unique ID against your name.

It is up to the users to not willingly provide this information. Trying to do this the regulatory way is all well and good, but it takes decades and the industry moves faster than that. And many countries don't care at all anyway.

You simply have to give up this dream of corporate ultra-convenience. You have to decide to live a slightly harder life: Linux instead of windows, open source instead of proprietary. Mastodon instead of Twitter, Lemmy instead of Reddit, etc etc

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

The article doesn't mention longevity problems with perovskite cells. I wonder if that's been overcome as part of this research.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't know what this is supposed to distract people from, but there's no way it's actual alien vehicles lol

view more: next ›