sidekickplayah

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (16 children)

But they are, that is the situation we are in. At every point we can say Hamas is a piece of shit group for using human shields, but that's not gonna change the situation. You keep saying that Hamas isn't getting enough criticism, but I think bombardment by the IDF is criticism enough. The whole ask is, stop shooting through the human shields to kill the bad guys. Even here there is doubt that there even was Hamas hiding with civilians to begin with. We are just giving Israel loads and loads of money, but we can't even get a more definitive answer than "we said so"? At this point I can only think that, even if by some chance Israel really isn't commiting a genocide, the end result will be indistinguishable from it. Palestine and it's people will be erased physically or culturally and we are allowing it to happen, and any pointing that out is met with "Hamas is the one using them as shields" or "Hamas started it". Hamas is unconscionable. Israel isn't, or atleast they say they aren't.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nice I got the CIA Award for Journalism

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You wouldn't mind explaining what it is then? I'm all ears.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (25 children)

Fukhueson when they find out you're not actually supposed to kill human shields:

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

That's the fake part. The gay part is: why is he lifting? Wanna look good for the men or some other gay shit?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

🏴‍☠️, Just a week away. 🏴‍☠️ is in a week! Woohoo! I am so happy about this information

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Time to finish Control ig

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You don't blame the IDF. So much for the "both sides suck" facade. And I don't see how you yourself can keep arguing about Hamas warcrimes when, as you've said, civilians are supporting the cause. That would mean they are fair game under your views. You can't have a "both sides suck" opinion when you've made notes that one side should clearly be justified.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

So thought-crime? They can't "hide" behind a civilian label because they felt angry about the deaths of their families? How many, realistically, are going to act on it? Because I specifically said that they want it, not that they are going to pursue it.

And fuck it, let's add to the fact that many are ACTIVELY trying to get out, and even of those, not many actually have the means or are too afraid of being killed whilst fleeing. Is that the actions of a so-called combatant?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (5 children)

We aren't talking about not killing Hamas though. We are talking about Palestinian civilians. You keep on sidestepping that. All comments I've seen you leave are you pretending to be this "both sides suck" person, but making no distinguishment between civilian and combatant with respect to Hamas and Palestine. You talk about Israel being justified in "getting its hands dirty to stop genocide". You generalize Palestinian civilians as terrorists for a sentiment that Israeli civilians have confessed to feeling themselves.

The ask has been, and always will be stop killing civilians, but there are no "civilians" on one side of the conflict to you, and that is why your sympathy isn't worth it. I must have missed the direct address to "Burstar's sympathy" in the article.

 
1
It's Rulemas (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
 
 
1
Business Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
1
It Still Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
 
1
It's Rulesday (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
1
Its Rulesday (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
1
Strategic Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
1
Its Rulesday (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
1
Its Rulesday (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›