silasmariner

Or a maths nerd!

Well that's just upsetting. What's the point of even asking trick questions like that if you're just gonna provide an inaccurate answer? Like, it's absolutely terrible teaching. If you're not comfortable teaching the concept of negative numbers just... don't ask questions where the answers are negative? Completely batshit

It's just a greentext. It's fake.

Also gay.

Mostly it's a fetishization of being the minderstood smart kid with scenarios that aren't true but feel true.

Pretty fake. Pretty gay.

I don't really like the slur I've been using here, but authenticity requires it. Oi moi.

Is it worth reading? I've played Witcher 3 and saw the first (sometimes good, sometimes shit) series of the show, but never read any...

Stop bringing your practical realism into my dreamworld moral absolutism

Maybe you're trying to match individuals to dissemination, idk man neither of us were there

I nearly dismissed your review until you qualified your assessment of onion rings. I have transposed the order on those first two myself

Onion rings top, then tots, then everything else

Easy enough. Tells you what languages are supported. Also helps you debug a bad language label. Although does have the disadvantage that you still need the name of every language in every language (the existing state) and you don't get to suddenly sqrt your data requirements for storing that

Literate programming as an ideal works at very very high level and very very low level. Plumbing code often doesn't benefit from comments at all, and is the usually the most subject to refactoring. Code by amateurs/neophytes is often not gonna be written in such a way that a clear description of the intention or mechanics is achievable by the coder. Unobtainable standard, smh. I like comments with a 'why' at the top and a 'what' at the bottom (of the stack. I'm talking about abstraction layers. Why am I doing this piece of logic in the code you can clearly understand at the top, what the fuck am I doing these weird shenanigans with a fucking red-black tree of all things in this low level generic function)

Yeah, and the comment you just replied to said: why not both? Language name in language up front, and language name in current language in parens. I think it's a neat idea and absolutely would support that as a standard.

Sometimes you just need to document the business reason behind what you're doing, regardless of how clear the code might be 😆