something_random_tho

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (19 children)

There’s not enough booze in the world to make me rawdog an onion like this.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

People are being snatched and sent to a death camp without a trial or even charges filed. People here legally with no criminal records. Parents with kids. Soccer coaches. The government has admitted in court that it sent people in error, but that it had no ability to undo the harms it caused.

No part of this is acceptable.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

What a terrible day to be able to read.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

After seeing how JD “couch-fucker” Vance used the American military base in Greenland to threaten them, I wouldn’t want American troops or bases anywhere near my country.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago

Babe wake up, new Linux socks just dropped.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Oh good, I’m glad we’re finding time for this as the global economy collapses.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

They tried to weasel out of saying that they sell your data, claiming that the CA law has an absurd definition. But the CA law just defines the term how any reasonable person would: the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) defines “sale” as the “selling, renting, releasing, disclosing, disseminating, making available, transferring, or otherwise communicating orally, in writing, or by electronic or other means, a consumer’s personal information by [a] business to another business or a third party” in exchange for “monetary” or “other valuable consideration.”

So yes, they’re selling your data, and CA law is finally forcing them to admit it, rather than continuing to lie about it.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Especially one that’s now selling your data. If Mozilla did this instead of selling our personal information, that would have been great. But here we are.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It’s my understanding that most insurance doesn’t cover “acts of terror.” So wouldn’t this mean Herr Trump and Musk will need to cover these costs out of pocket, based on their own words?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Man pages are still not great on Linux. Very few examples with common use-cases and explanations. I shouldn’t need to visit the Arch wiki.

OpenBSD man pages are a delight in comparison, and really all you need to learn how to manage the system.

 

Hi friends, I'm back, this time jotting down some notes around my go-to way to provision VMs using Ansible. This post assumes Debian (Nix may be a future post).

Of course there's many ways to provision a server, and this is just one of them. I hope some of these notes are helpful!

If you have any other ways you prefer to set up a server, that would be cool to share!

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21065836

Hi friends, as promised, I'm back with my second post. I'll be hanging around in the comments for any questions!

In this post, I take a look at a typical deployment process, how long each part of it takes, and then I present a simple alternative that I use which is much faster and perfect for hobbit software.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21065836

Hi friends, as promised, I'm back with my second post. I'll be hanging around in the comments for any questions!

In this post, I take a look at a typical deployment process, how long each part of it takes, and then I present a simple alternative that I use which is much faster and perfect for hobbit software.

 

Hi friends, as promised, I'm back with my second post. I'll be hanging around in the comments for any questions!

In this post, I take a look at a typical deployment process, how long each part of it takes, and then I present a simple alternative that I use which is much faster and perfect for hobbit software.

48
You're overcomplicating production (paravoce.bearblog.dev)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21023181

Sharing some lessons I learned from 10 years/millions of users in production. I’ll be in the comments if anyone has any questions!

I hope this series will be useful to the self-hosted and small web crowds—tips for tools to pick and the basics of server management.

48
You're overcomplicating production (paravoce.bearblog.dev)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Sharing some lessons I learned from 10 years/millions of users in production. I’ll be in the comments if anyone has any questions!

 

I recently found that the OsmAnd app lets you adjust the safety of your bike routes, so you can prefer safety over distance.

When navigating, click the "Ride Style" button and choose "prefer unpaved roads." That name made me think it would find gravel/off-road trails, but it actually selects safer roads. In my experience this setting chooses the optimal routes--it's finding the same general path that I would pick based on local knowledge, and it found improvements where I could take a slightly different street for a few blocks to avoid cars!

Also, OsmAnd~ is available via Fdroid with all the paywalls removed.

78
pls (lemmynsfw.com)
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16790112

Just tried commuting on my bike from Santa Monica to downtown Culver City today. I took the Exposition bike path, which was fine until I needed to get off of it to head south.

Google recommended I take National and--lo and behold--there's no bike lane with cars flying past at 55mph+ on blind hills. That's a death trap.

On the way home I left early to avoid traffic. I took Venice Blvd, since it has a protected bike lane all the way until McLaughlin which Google Maps called "bicycle friendly." No bike lane, of course, with cars flying past leaving a foot of distance between me and death. One testy driver in a BMW didn't want to wait the 15 seconds for me to pedal into the left turn lane to get back onto the Exposition bike path, honking and then flying by nearly killing me. Jeez lady, I'm not the city planner. Don't kill me to save 15 seconds.

How does Culver City put zero bike lanes going north to south connecting to the Exposition path? How do these drivers maintain their licenses?

What's a cyclist to do?

1
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Just tried commuting on my bike from Santa Monica to downtown Culver City today. I took the Exposition bike path, which was fine until I needed to get off of it to head south.

Google recommended I take National and--lo and behold--there's no bike lane with cars flying past at 55mph+ on blind hills. That's a death trap.

On the way home I left early to avoid traffic. I took Venice Blvd, since it has a protected bike lane all the way until McLaughlin which Google Maps called "bicycle friendly." No bike lane, of course, with cars flying past leaving a foot of distance between me and death. One testy driver in a BMW didn't want to wait the 15 seconds for me to pedal into the left turn lane to get back onto the Exposition bike path, honking and then flying by nearly killing me. Jeez lady, I'm not the city planner. Don't kill me to save 15 seconds.

How does Culver City put zero bike lanes going north to south connecting to the Exposition path? How do these drivers maintain their licenses?

What's a cyclist to do?

view more: next ›