spark947

joined 2 years ago
[–] spark947@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Yes, vendor lock in is always a concern around AWS. I am of 2 minds about this - the real trade off with on demand resources is cost as AWS has to essentially have hot instances ready for customers, which cost them more to run. So it definitely makes sense to have these billing options that help them save operational overhead and then pass the savings on to their customers.

But it is a fine line. What should be AWS responsibility and what should be the customers? Amazon's whole deal is trying to step over it it ways that will ultimately be monopolistic. Personally, I am much more concerned with the egress costs, which is their true and much sneakier vendor lock in trap.

To me, the only answer is government regulation. We should treat cloud resources as a utility and regulate it as such to make sure that the large players don't abuse their monopoly on compute power and servers. Instead, the government's answer has been to do away with net neutrality, which really only makes them more powerful because they still have a monopoly on the physical resources. This is one of the reasons why I have become self hosted for my own personal technology - but for work there are a lot of benefits to just shutting up and working with a monopoly that at least has to try to drive down costs at some level to prevent regulatory action.

These services only make sense at scale and with large projects that need a ton of planning everyday. AWS will take the little people's money if they are willing to give it, but they aren't truly interested in their business.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Yes, that is why I said enterprise scale. Pricing for personal stuff is pretty terrible, although it is reasonable in some ways.

I find AWS prices to be very reasonable, but it is much different than going race to the bottom deal hunting on hetzner. That's definitely where you want to go deal hunting, but it isn't suitable for a lot of enterprise applications.

With the bigger CSPs, you really have to take care of the billing yourself to get the best value. Last year, my team was able to cut our client's cloud bill by 85% while improving service. Kind of unfair - AWS will happily take your money to do stuff incorrectly. They have business units at AWS around customer success that aims to help cut costs, but I can kind of tell they aren't a priority at the company compared to account execs. Pretty normal for this business, unfortunately.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Let's be clear here: I would never say that about oracle.

But yeah, idk what to tell you. What cloud service vendor have you had a better experience with than AWS? Genuinely curious. Do you really like GCP? I have had some good experiences, but I feel some of their services can be a miss. If you say Azure or IBM, I won't believe you. For projects that I would consider enterprise scale, I don't take anyone else seriously.

Enterprise is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. I would never use them for my smaller scale personal stuff. I would recommend something like Digital Ocean to smaller devs, but for personal projects I think self hosted is the way to go.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Just make them put support for manifest v2 back.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (7 children)

For lower end, absolutely. For higher end enterprise space? Not so much. For me, AWS is the gold standard for product support and price at enterprise scale, and I do think I have ever worked on an enterprise application that could orchestrate 100% on its own (only for bad reasons, this is what I do at home).

I do hope a lack of reliance on these services leads to better technological solutions to come out of Europe and make its way back to the states. The enterprise made the Faustian bargain with these CSPs, and although the cloud networking is somewhat nice, the applications are a disaster.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I'm not even that down on using LLMs to search through and organize text that it was trained on. But in it's current iteration? It's fancy stack overflow, but stack overflow runs on like 6 servers. I'll be setting up some LLM stuff self hosted to play around with it, but I'm not ditching my brain's ability to write software any time soon.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 108 points 1 month ago (18 children)

What are you guys working on where chatgpt can figure it out? Honestly, I haven't been able to get a scrap of working code beyond a trivial example out of that thing or any other LLM.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Another commentor pointed out a legitimate use case, but it's not even worth thinking about that much. De-duplocated is usually a word you use in data science to talk aboutakong sure your dataset is "hygienic" and that you aren't duplicating data points. A database is much different because it is less about representing data, and more about storing it in a way that allows you to perform transactions at scale - retrieval, storage, modification, etc. Relational databases are analyzed in terms of data cardinality which essentially describes tradeoffs in representation between speed of retrieval (duplications good) vs storage efficiency (duplications bad).

The issue is that Elon is so vague and so off the mark that it is very hard to believe that he even has the first clue about what he is a talking about. Even you are confused just by reading it. It is all a tactic to convince others that he is smarter than he is while doing extreme damage to the hardworking people that actually make this stuff possible. Have you noticed that the man has never come to a conclusion that wasn't in his interests? This is not honest intellectualism, or discussion based on technical merit. It's self serving propaganda.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

No I agree, that's what I'm trying to say. Open source is the only way to create better software, but the software we have is pretty good. Better software won't cure what ails us.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It's a useless discussion open source is as good as to is gonna get technology wise. Their will always be a problem as long as profitable enterprise is what people rely on to make a living and feed their families. Fixing that requires more than open source software.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

It's so mindbending to see people that nerdanwere yelling about on the Internet about drm and micro transactions literally protect rapists and abusers. Like, we tried warning everyone.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Honestly, might be a good thing kinda. Adoption in the front end world is out of control.

view more: next ›