Lol, good point.
stella
joined 1 year ago
I think it'd be more accurate to say you can refuse service to republicans, which you already could do.
You seem to be conflating hiring with serving.
No it doesn't, for the reasons I explained.
If you think saying 'discrimination' is more accurate than saying what that discrimination is, then you simply don't have a firm grasp of the English language.
It could be more accurate. How is he discriminating against them? Oh, he's refusing service. Let me try the non-biased headline:
"Photographer wins right to refuse service to LGBTQ+ couples"
This way, instead of the vague term 'discrimination', we can focus on the specifics so people have a more accurate idea of what's going on.
Don't forget about revenge!
We don't use that word often enough when it's completely applicable.
Alright, buddy. Gonna block you now.
You seem too far gone.
Now this is combat footage.
Just like global warming, the consequences for funneling as much money to as few people as possible will not be immediately apparent.
Aviation, military, infrastructure, medicine, agriculture, all of it is going to get worse in subtle ways before we notice how broken they've become. People just can't be expected to care when they're not being compensated accordingly. The more people who realize that 'work' isn't about supporting society, it's about serving the ruling class, the more people will slack off because they don't actually care about the work being done.
Quality is down. Prices are up.
These problems will continue to get worse as long as the disparity in wealth continues to grow.
Eh. More than likely he won't have the money to develop it.
How do you get electricity out there? Plumbing?
Who cuts down those trees?
It could be nice for a little shack, but that's about it.