stella

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think you get it, because that was not my point.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No. If the supreme court makes a ruling that is so unpopular that people don't follow it, then people won't follow it.

Not the Supreme Court, but cannabis is still a Schedule 1 controlled substance. That didn't stop states from legalizing it because of how unpopular prohibition is. The federal government knows this, which is why we don't see massive retaliation against states with legal weed.

Government and its enforcement is way more communal than people realize.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Could've been a great opportunity to teach users how to sideload apps.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All according to plan.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Dang. It's so nice getting informative responses instead of memes and lame jokes.

Thank you.

[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Trust me, it's not.

For every story like this, there are literally millions where regular women make next to nothing for their nudes.

Most normal women with OFs usually end up having a few subs from people they know who just want to distribute their nudes among peers. Imagine thinking you're going to make thousands when you end up making less than $100, and now everyone has your nudes.

That's the reality for most people on OF. And it's sad.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think it's sad seeing this considering all the women I know who have been suckered into making OFs only to make a few bucks from weirdos saving their nudes.

Porn is the same, really. Most people who do porn make very little money from it, but still have to deal with their naked bodies on the internet.

view more: ‹ prev next ›