sysadmin

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

Privacy Front-end Nitter:

https://xcancel.com/carlrichell/status/1815498238285562127

https://nitter.privacydev.net/carlrichell/status/1815498238285562127

Extracted from Twitter:

The first alpha release of Pop!_OS 24.04 with COSMIC will be released August 8th.

@jeremy_soller , Maria, and I join the System76 Transmission Log pod to chat about how COSMIC came to be and where it’s headed.

https://system76.transistor.fm/10

 

On their order page, it says "Ships within two weeks"

Cheers!

 

Even after all these years firefox keeps using mozilla hidden directory instead of XDG base directories. For how long will this continue?

Watch https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=259356 for updates to this request.

~/.mozilla/firefox/ is a mish-mash of data, config, and cache. It's not simple to unravel that. Beyond that, it would be a breaking change, and that requires more caution.

credit: u/yo_99 on Reddit.

original link: https://old.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/vkgk78/why_does_firefox_keeps_using_mozilla_directory/

 

Hi everyone, I have just recently found out there is a thing like coreboot/libreboot, and I like the concept of it: fast(er), secure, open source, easy to flash and non-brickable process.

I’ve been trying to understand the basics behind it and it’s too difficult for me. I have some basic understanding of what BIOS / EFI is. And as I understand it, the core/libreboot is an open-source replacement for it. Great!

But what I’m interested in is understanding, how it manages to be better than the OEM’s BIOS? I understand that the nature of open-source is better than closed source software, but what I don’t understand is how this project manages to be better for end-user?

As I get it, it’s similar to Custom ROMs on Android. There is an OEM’s rom — say, Samsung — it makes its version of Android, and it’s good (in terms of how it works with the hardware), but usually with tons of bloatware and OEM never updates the phone after a customer bought it. Here we have Custom ROMs, like CyanogenMod / Lineage OS / Pixel Experience / etc. etc. Those ROMs somehow manage to keep the software updated for much longer time-frame, having extra functionality and even working faster. (Frankly, I don’t understand how do they manage to do that as well, and why it’s so difficult for OEMs.)

Is this something similar? I can understand the (ineffective) processes of big corporations, but I cannot understand how the developers manage to keep those things better, lighter, etc. Say, whether the OEM’s firmwares somehow bloated? Why is so then? Why won’t a big company like Gigabyte, Asus, Acer, etc. also use this product, why do they write so-closed-source BIOSes and EFIs then, if they can use something lighter and faster, and in so many ways better? As it’s advertised on the website of coreboot.

I’m not sure I keep the question simple, for others to understand, but if talking about the real hardware. Say, I have Asus MAXIMUS IV GENE-Z motherboard. Can I install coreboot on it (seems like yes, according to the website https://coreboot.org/status/board-status.html#asus/maximus_iv_gene-z), and if I can, will it miss some functionality comparing to its original EFI? I mean not that I need it, but I’m interested whether there’s something special in original firmware or not. There are many things on the website, at ‘ROG Exclusive Features’ and ‘Special Features’ sections, but I’m not aware if it’s something special or it’s just some marketing bullshit, is it located in the firmware, or it’s something entirely different they speak of in that section?

Please pardon me if the question is too newbish and was answered somewhere. I’ve tried to do my search and found no information on my question. I would appreciate any comment on this topic. Thanks!

edit: Found Why use coreboot? (reddit post) And it’s an interesting read itself, but it’s not the question I’m trying to find answer to.

credit: u/walteweiss on Reddit.

original link: https://www.reddit.com/r/coreboot/comments/bgjzth/how_does_coreboot_manage_to_be_better_than/

 

This guide is written for subscription based microsoft office 365. However, you may have luck with other versions, and the instructions should still work (just replace office 365 with your version whenever this guide says it).

In short:

  1. Download crossover from codeweavers. You need to enter some contact info, but you could use an alias.
  1. Download the office 365 .exe installer using a valid office 365 subscription (get it from office.com, you will need an browser extension to switch your user agent to windows otherwise the download button won’t be there at all). You could also try one of the annual versions (eg office 2016) but I haven’t tried that myself, if you do the remaining steps it should still be similar.
  1. In crossover search for office 365 and follow the steps, all you need to manually do is give it the .exe you got earlier.
  1. Agree to whatever is prompted and then finish off the installation
  1. Start word/excel/powerpoint up (at this point they should all appear along with your other apps just like you’d expect). You can also start it from crossover itself.
  1. Try to sign in to office with your licensed account so word/excel/powerpoint doesn’t lock you out after a few days. It can be finicky, if it doesn’t work try restarting the app and trying again. Do make sure your password is being entered properly, I found copy paste to not be working in that field correctly.

Install the Crossover deb file download it from the official Crossover site Install the Office setup through Crossover

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH5JYshhtYg&t=201s

Winapps (https://github.com/Fmstrat/winapps) is a free alternative.

OneDrive Client (https://github.com/abraunegg/onedrive)

credit: u/FxizxlxKhxn on Reddit.

original link: https://old.reddit.com/r/pop_os/comments/oye6ar/successfully_installed_office365_on_pop_os_using/

archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20210805094312/https://old.reddit.com/r/pop_os/comments/oye6ar/successfully_installed_office365_on_pop_os_using/

credit: u/FlatAds on Reddit.

original link: https://reddit.com/r/linux/comments/l805ll/guide_install_microsoft_office_365_via/

archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20220729045244/https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/l805ll/guide_install_microsoft_office_365_via/

 
 

If you are interested in modding, please DM

 

This is a community for people to sell trade and swap items

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

If you're already on a Linux-based operating system, and you gotta run a real instance of Windows for some reason, your safest bet from both a security and privacy standpoint is to run it in a virtual machine (I like VirtualBox, personally, but VMWare, or whatever else will do the job fine also) and firewall the hell out of it. In a virtual machine, you can totally lock it down as much or as little as you need for the task at hand, and ain't a damned thing Windows itself can really do about it, and as an added bonus, it saves you from the required reboots of dual-booting. It's confined to a "safe space" (until you start opening enabling network stuff and opening ports to it). You're in control.

edit: or QEMU/KVM (with virt-manager)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Really you'd have to fire up Wireshark and see what telemetry Windows was blabbing away behind your back. Analysing those logs can be a tedious business, especially as you'd need a large dataset.

Thing with just about any tech related question posted is likely some geek will have done the heavy lifting for you already. Here is a nice start:

https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-10-and-telemetry-time-for-a-simple-network-analysis/

Here is another one:

https://www.comparitech.com/blog/information-security/windows-10-data/

That's logs required to be collected, doesn't say whether or not the data is sent back to Windows. Best assume yes.

Course, all that proprietary software will have a voluminous licence agreement that nobody reads. They'll collect as much data as they can to "maximise user experience" or whatever rubbish.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pro is a little bit better because of features like Bitlocker. A lot better would be Education/Enterprise variant. You'd need special licenses for running enterprise I think. There are also registry hacks that would give you some protection against telemetry (I personally haven't done this).

Privacy-wise though, any "windows" is going to fare lower than linux is what I'd say. Wait for others in the sub for more insights.

view more: next ›