tee9000

I refuse to believe people are that dumb

This... comment... its not a meme or a trope. I feel... l dont know what to feel or what to say. Can you please convert this to an image with text or at least make your comment seem like you are 100% certain about who needs to die??

Pavlov VR

I dont know what you are even trying to say

Is that better or worse?

History is watching you fly a military escort to the amazon and back for a photo op you dip

So they are moving away from general models and specializing them to tasks as certain kind of ai agents

It will probably make queries with those agents defined in a narrow domain and those agents will probably be much less prone to error.

I think its a good next step. Expecting general intelligence to arise out of LLMs with larger training models is obviously a highly criticized idea on Lemmy, and this move supports the apparent limitations of this approach.

If you think about it, assigning special "thinking" steps for ai models makes less sense for a general model, and much more sense for well-defined scopes.

We will probably curate these scopes very thoroughly over time and people will start trusting the accuracy of their answer through more tailored design approaches.

When we have many many effective tailored agents for specialized tasks, we may be able to chain those agents together into compound agents that can reliably carry out many tasks like we expected from AI in the first place.

I would hope that PCVR would at least be merged with the standalone population and their experience enhanced with more computing power as possible. But yeah the demanding native PCVR games might only exist with merged flatscreen populations (simulators), be a singleplayer experience, or cease to have a multiplayer population when/if standalones mature and dominate the market.

But everyday devices like glasses wont be used for games. And standalone gaming hmds will always be balancing between processing power and form factor (weight/size) because we will always want to push the performance boundary.

I would love to concede to standalone device for the user population benefit if there was a computing puck or something that wirelessly transmitted to a very lightweight hmd... i dont like wearing a computer when it could be lighter.

I like that the success of VR was acknowledged as a pretty arbitrary benchmark.

For me, it means being able to hop on games and join a robust multiplayer community that doesnt "need your support"... its just available. But im obviously talking about gaming exclusively.

I dont think theres going to be a lot of overlap between gaming and augmented reality for everyday use due to hardware limitation versus form factor. Glasses wearers wont be able to run games well, and gaming hmds wont be comfortable/fashionable enough to wear around. If this is ever possible it wont be in the foreseeable future. They seem like very different markets with different expectations of a product.

VR gaming needs to get more comfortable, faster/seamless/glitch free loading screens, and compelling/engaging content.

When VR gaming can offer better long term experiences than beat saber and gorilla tag... something that engages long term (progression) and combines the social experience then people will buy headsets for that game and standalone VR gaming will be more than an experiment.

Its frustrating that such a game is possible but hasnt been done yet.

Facebook memes... nice.

No, not at all.

There have also been failures at a rate that would make human space flight concerning. Why wouldnt more experience be better? You are saying we didnt learn anything about space flight with each mission?

I dont know what mars coin is. Why do you generalize my appreciation for spaceflight to other unrelated opinions? Im not a group of people, im an individual who you know nothing about. Stop with the weird guessing of my beliefs.