[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

and robot dogs?

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

people voted for this

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

"crypto" and "a.i." was just dads throwing pearls ("software toys", softpower sex toys) to swine (the kids alright)

11
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

how could daughters look their engineer-dads in the eyes, no matter the country they're in, the same before? this was our BeforeTimes (ignoring Bill Gates' antitrust). everyone knows this was a chokehold, and you did not all celebrate the "or you're fired" bit, nor did you only see it as "mere play". "americans" are not the only ones to blame. the paternalism ain't paternalizing. discuss.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

i overheard a black preacher, the other day, on the television, assert that people who are 80 years old are "outliving" those who are "30" and "40"; while other preachers are still making outward commitments to the belief in a something-to-come. two ways in which preachers make use of eschatological thinking at the ends of history.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

is this because we're listening to all that damn "post-hardcore" music on the patios and at the parks in public?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

If machine intelligence is indeed a different form of intelligence, then it can be observed and judged on the basis of its own merits, as opposed to a messianic waiting for a moment where it might equal or eclipse (weakly defined) human intelligence. This would even render obsolete the question as to whether or not machines can think—which in itself willfully glosses over the corresponding opposite question, “Can humans think?” posed by the former Fluxus artist (and Emmett Williams collaborator) Tomas Schmit in the year 2000 (Schmit et al. 2007, 18–19). — Crapularity Hermeneutics: Interpretation as the Blind Spot of Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, and Other Algorithmic Producers of the Postapocalyptic Present. Florian Cramer.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

bullied bullies bully bullied bullies bullying bullied bullies

2
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

moreover, do jungian concepts shape the understanding that grounds "a.i."?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
  1. metacognitive myopia explained why people didn't/couldn't update their beliefs about the existence of "weapons of mass destruction etc".
  2. dogwhistling the threat of sexual revolution "comrade kamala" (i.e., he's implying hypocrisy when he doesn't understand what lenin's use of the term "prostitute" meant).
  3. playing the fool until you can't (i.e., making his base feel insightful and "seen" as playfully serious, homophilically/mimetically charismatic; e.g., his base feels like their inference-making is being promoted based on linguistic sympathy through the aura of charisma).
  4. from (3) somewhere in his administration they're letting the would-be "fool" base do the grunt-work and creating cover; see "Optimal Team Formation Under Asymmetric Information".
25
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

(if you Select All and copy really fast behind an adblocker you can get all the text)

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

elizabeth warren lampoons trump and vance

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

have books become too heavy for men?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

algorithms of oppression. noble.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

as a black person i'm worried that donald trump's batting average isn't showing the potential it should be this season. he should spend more time in the cages.

view more: next ›

tetranomos

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago