thingsiplay
Hmm sounds reasonable. After my question I was reading the original news from Archlinux and the following statement
In order to not break user setups, we kept these repositories around in an unused and empty state.
suggest that the empty and unused repositories have no effect. I don't know why they kept this, because removing them would break back then. Removing them now breaks it today, so not sure why they delayed that, as nothing is won. I will ~~un~~comment out (Edit: I meant I will comment out) those lines and see what happens. :D In worst case the system cannot update and I can reverse the change. But there is no reason why the system should not able to update, if the repositories are empty.
Another Edit: Me dummy don't have any [community] repository. Not sure if I removed it before (very possible) or if it is removed by my distribution (please don't hurt me, I'm just using EndeavourOS).
Should we remove old repositories NOW or wait until update 2025-03-01 and then remove them?
It's probably for the best for everyone involved.
Last 6 Months: I don't know when, but Mint finally beat the "extremely popular" distribution MX Linux. Good to see that EndeavourOS is right after it on place 3. Ubuntu still not very popular on place 8, but might climb up soon after the new release. Archlinux is on place 67, because nobody uses it; even Gentoo is more popular on place 63.
Obviously I don't take this too seriously.
Numerous games received improvements in Mesa 25.0, including ..., Marvel Rivals, ...
My hope is that Mesa 25 will fix the crashes lot of us have on Marvel Rivals. Fingers crossed 🤞
Similarly, there's a strong possibility that GIMP 3.0 will be included with Ubuntu 25.04, as the third (and final) release candidate (RC3) has appeared
I would not bet any Bitcoin on this one. :p
You keep ignoring my questions. You think these answers and your post is valuable?? It contributes to spam and has no value.
So you don't even have a single example. Well I consider your post as useless and spam. Please stop posting useless and spam like this. Edit: Also you still don't answer a single question. Who is the judge? Who do I ask if my posts are okay to post? You?
Don't make this a personal attack. Do you have any article you consider to be shitty? As an example, so we are on the same page. Do you ever wrote them a message or did an issue, so they are aware of the issue and can correct the mistake? Do you think they read this post of you and stop posting, because you do not agree with what they consider to be useful?
Sorry but, you are not the person who decides who can post and who cannot. I have seen shitty articles that others find useful, and I saw good articles that others find shitty. Do you get what I mean?
I thought Polonius would be part of the 2024 Edition, and was sad not seeing being mentioned at all. Good to see its still being worked on.