threelonmusketeers

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Did the source code printout have an annoying space accent, or... ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I don't think I'm familiar with this song...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

"Well, how is it un-typical?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

How do you remember your username?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

There would be fewer VHS copies of Star Wars which mysteriously wore out at the trash compactor scene.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Fisher explained that Lucas informed her, “In space you get weightless, and so your flesh expands.” In this scenario, he was convinced that a bra wouldn’t expand along with the skin. So, in the end, a woman like Leia could wind up being strangled by her own brassiere.

I'm sorry George, but what made you think that? That's not even considering that all the ships in Star Wars seem to have artificial gravity anyway...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately your application fell within a window of these notifications being broken on our end, as we had to fix some stuff following our recent Lemmy update.

In the future, could signups be temporarily closed during these periods, or is it too difficult to anticipate when such a period might be?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

Can't fix this with an over-the-air update.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

All I can see is rockets with commercials on them

There was that one Russian Proton rocket with the Pizza Hut logo on the side...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago

It's like the world's most expensive Cygnus vehicle.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Not entirely /s. Kuiper on Falcon 9 was confirmed over a year ago.

Starliner (Strainer?) on Falcon 9 would violate NASA's dissimilar redundancy requirements, but if the other options are Starliner not flying at all, or human-rating Vulcan, then maybe it could happen?

 

Falcon 9 is a skinny boi

Credit to Dawson81702

 
 
6
submitted 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

| Scheduled for (UTC) | 2025-03-21, 06:49 | |


|


| | Scheduled for (local) | 2025-03-20, 23:49 (PDT) | | Launch site | SLC-4E, Vandenberg SFB, California, USA | | Booster | B1088-4 | | Landing | LZ-4 | | Payloads | Reconnaissance satellites | | Customer | National Reconnaissance Office | | Target orbit | LEO |

Webcasts

| Stream | Link | |


|


| | Space Affairs | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vp8kZon5Nk | Spaceflight Now | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nkJIjdSCuw | NASASpaceflight | none | The Launch Pad | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvACDETZfgs | SpaceX | https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1902973122195886584 | The Space Devs | https://www.youtube.com/@thespacedevs/videos

Stats

Sourced from NextSpaceflight and r/SpaceX:

☑️ 10th launch from SLC-4E this year

☑️ 6 days, 0:06:00 turnaround for this pad

☑️ 26th landing on LZ-4

☑️ 426th Falcon Family Booster landing, 439th Falcon recovery attempt

☑️ 33rd Falcon 9 mission this year, 451st overall

☑️ 33rd SpaceX mission this year, 467th (excluding Starship flights)

☑️ 35th SpaceX launch this year, 484th overall (including Starship flights)

Mission info

Launching just 9 days after B1088's previous mission on SPHEREx & PUNCH, NROL-57 will set a new booster turnaround record by around 4 days.

 
 
57
Oh no (sh.itjust.works)
 
 
view more: next ›