throwback3090

joined 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

No the reason is they are pro-nazi

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

The sad thing is this is kinda solved in the advertising space. Like, they know who I am, uniquely, including emails, phone numbers, and drivers license. The data is available, but banks (the primary users of the SSN) are perpetually stuck with 30yo tech.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I do not get any better or worse sleep by telling you you're rude. You may be under the delusion you are responding to someone else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I didn't say yeah no

I said the person I responded to was being rude to the person they responded to

It's possible to disagree on a subject without implying the person you disagree with is a dumb child.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (7 children)

You being pessimistic does not make you wise.

It does, apparently, make you condescending. But not wise.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Lol "the birthers" as if that wasn't mostly trump.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Putin's under study?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I don't personally believe in what she believes in, but it's perfectly reasonable for someone who grew up during this country's Reagan era to truly and genuinely believe that serving in the military is a valuable and fulfilling purpose that's greater and more important than the needs of a single family.

Maybe it's clown makeup, but wouldn't it be nice to feel some sense of purpose in your life rather than spending it shit talking people on the internet?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

People don't normally view serving in their country's military as a war crime. By your standards 99% of anyone is who has ever been in any modern military should probably be in jail, and that's not going to happen so why stress your little head about it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Destroyers were classically ships that defended a larger group. They would fight submarines and other ship to ship threats in order to leave cruisers and aircraft carriers to their work.

Destroyer was not, in it's original meaning, focused on ship to land bombardment (that's only part of the current generation because technology shrunk enough and nobody wants to spend a shitton of money on big boats anymore except the US)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Guess we best acquit then

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

If success is fucking over millions of people....sure

view more: ‹ prev next ›