uis

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

This was taken BEFORE tram went to ramming speed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Cute. Ok, just for this cuteness.

so much floof
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Downvote, this is not an optical illusion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

But then anyone could take them anyway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm saying it is necessary to achieve the aims of the GPL.

Which would make GPL toothless, but that’s fine because it would no longer be necessary.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

But then corporations could not stop anyone from modifying their modifications to things like Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm yet to see how AI makes #2 relevant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Copyright for software is a joke. Software is only copyrightable thing, where mandatory copy is not enforced.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Free software is response to software copyright and software patents.

Trademark is also useful. I don't want Tyson making fake vegan hot dogs

It has nothing to do with trademark.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Example. Copyright is a joke. For art if you have more lawyers, you win. For software mandatory copy laws are not enforced and source code gets destroyed forever.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Patent documents are rarely useful because they're kept as general and opaque as possible to cover as many innovations as possible.

I think this is a problem that can be fixed inside of patent system. Make it so by the end of patent life there is "how to build production line of this" manual.

view more: ‹ prev next ›