Nyet
wholookshere
joined 10 months ago
Yes,
I use arch BTW.
Yeah my goal was wired for this reason.
I've worked on Bluetooth as a developer and good lord it needs to burn in a fire.
That question is what brings me here!
I'm thinking of doing a soundbar and subwoofer in the living room, sound bars alone in each bedroom and some bookshelf speakers in other rooms
It misses where apple brought back audio and magsafe
Audio is valid, but apple brought back magesafe.
EDIT my 3 year oldacbook pro has bothagsafe and 3.5mm audio.
Except devices, specifically quoting routers, Do make up bot nets
That's the specfici malware used on unsecured IoT devices and routers.
I was able to find tons of scholarly articles Like this one
That specifically talk about how many of these devices get comprised.
This isn't some theoretical attack vector. This is active now.
The risk of taking down large portions of the internet has the same risks as a vacuum? Interesting.
Your right not every device has parts availability. But again, why not? Because it it'll cost more?
Your willing to risk tanking the digital economy for what has historically been huge sums of money, because we don't hold vacuum cleaners to higher standards?
I'm being obtuse, but you keep pointing to "well we don't fix that problem over there, so we shouldn't do it over here". It doesn't sway me. We should absolutely fix repability of ALL ELECRONTICS AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
We do take cars that fail safety inspections off the road. You are correct, we don't hold them to higher standards, but that's not a reason why we also shouldn't remove genuine hazards off the roads.
If a car is far more likely to kill someone, it shouldn't be on public roads either. Just like devices that can't be update don't belong on public nets. The risk to the broader public is to big IMO.
Where was the outrage for Laura Croft?
There wasn't any.
People are just getting their panties in a bunch because culture war.
It's Poe's law.