Always has been.
ynthrepic
Surprised so few people are aware of this. It seems equivalent to me when you give it the same permissions Ublock Origin had.
Death is undefined from the perspective of conscious experience. That's really my point.
It is axiomatic that if there is something that it is like to be dead then you are not in fact "dead".
Just for fun then, I agree with you in some respects. Panpsychism might be the way the universe works and is in fact my own sense of reality - but the kind of "consciousness" that may persist upon the disintegration of the brain and body, won't answer to "you" unless there is in fact a soul or spirit that exists separate to the body. Of that, I am not so sure. I'm thinking consciousness is probably something spooky separate to the body, but the idea that this fleeting thing that answers to my identity could have its own potentially eternal or at least much more resilient contingency doesn't really make sense. More like, we are all part of the same singularity of consciousness that is the universe, dreaming ourselves into existence as discrete conscious actors in a grand play. Something like that, haha.
Life is all we can possibly conceive of knowing. I can't tell you that you ought to live, but I can tell you that there might not be anything it's like to be dead. Is it worth the risk?
However bad life might be at any given moment, unless total non-existence sounds "good" to you, death isn't a risk worth taking. After all, we are always at some risk of dying. It'll happen eventually.
If you were in the military would you follow orders that are unconstitutional? Which is to say, an order that requires you to suppress the American people?
I would hope service people would see what is happening and say no. But that's a hope more than anything.
Hi, my name is ynthrepic and I'm a workaholic.
I have one of those jobs where holidays just mean double the work when you get back. None of the work goes anywhere, and there's nobody else who can pick up the slack.
I actually love what I do, but...
I work in the public sector, and do heaps of unpaid overtime, to make life better for people who don't understand the only reason we don't do a better job is because the government keeps cutting our budgets, claiming it's because we don't do a better job with the money we were given the previous year.
We also do regular restructures which reduce morale and stoke fear, but the only people who lose their jobs are low level workers, or they just remove vacancies and claim savings on those, while moving middle managers sideways and not actually improving efficiency.
My job gets harder, I end up making more mistakes or have to cut corners to make shit happen. I complain I get in trouble. I have a kid.
I'm so fucking glad though I don't live or work in the US. Y'all are so fucking fucked.
There is a little bit of an assumption of the mad scientist here. Most scientists and engineers are very compassionate and caring people, even if many are excentric. We care about a thriving humanities department.
The psychopath cohort you're thinking of is the executive branch, or the people who made it to sales manager.
I mean yeah the internet has proliferated stupid. But I think everyone was always stupid, but just nowhere near power.
We need a meritocratic system that is also based on modern science and social psychology, and it needs to be diverse, equitable, and inclusive too...
If it's always been that way, how did things ever get better?
Nah, it's all about the money. It's literally just trolling with people lives to make money off of their inevitable fear
The only way to win, is if people who have invested money aren't afraid of losing it. Which of course almost nobody, because when gambling the house almost always wins. Which is to say an increasingly small minority get to win the lottery of a financially free life.
I'd prefer things end without violence... Which puts me in the most impossible timeline there is. It's so frustrating realizing they're all literally stupid or manipulated by stupid. Stupid being the promise of wealth, power, and fame ironically at all costs.
Clinically psychopathic. Sociopathy is the result.
The distinction is important because neurotypical people can be raised to behave in ways that are sociopathic, both directly and indirectly. Most of the ultra wealthy who are born into wealth for example explain away the harms their lives cause others. But they still feel and express empathy in many aspects of their lives
But Musk seems genuinely like he has no genuine empathy, and like he has no comprehension of how to be a moral actor in the world. Trump is the same.
Being reasonable intelligent and born into privilege in the world that rewards sociopathy through the market system... psychopaths seem to disproportionately find themselves in positions of power. It's perverse.