zanzo

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On the Pros/Cons slide there is mention that the US may be losing the UAP race. My thoughts went straight to the Alaska UAP shoot down during the Chinese ‘balloon’ incidents.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

except some of the pilots note the objects ‘move side to side’ and starlink will form a consistent linear pattern maintaining the same distance.

 

This one can come across as an promo for Sheehan’s New Paradigm Institute but he drops some stuff that will raise eyebrows…even among people familiar with the topic. Among them: He suggests there is a film of an interview with a NHI being that could come out once we are much further into Disclosure. He also gets into the NPI’s plans to pressure Congress to strengthen the disclosure act that was recently watered down, including political campaigns to pressure holdouts.

You can skip the first quarter if you’re already familiar with Sheehan’s background.

1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

John Michael Godier has a preview of this week’s Event Horizon which looks at the mystery of anomalous stars in astronomical pictures from the 1950s, before Sputnik. In fact one of these images occurred the same day of the 1952 Washington DC UFO event.

 

A good synopsis about the internal struggle with the government. Kelleher also discusses the mounting evidence the the phenomenon intentionally uses deception to confound researchers. There’s also a discussion around the phenomenon’s ability to alter human perception and how biological evidence like DNA may not be very helpful.

 

Speaking together on the Senate floor, the two co-sponsors of the disclosure act celebrated their partial victory and reiterated their determination to see the Presidential Review Board established eventually.

 

A one hour special on Aussie TV.

 

Of note in this report is the suggestion that someone has spoken with the two Republicans opposing disclosure. And it’s hinted that they were warned that failure to support controlled disclosure would result in ‘catastrophic’ disclosure…which I take to mean, runaway disclosure.

My mind turns to something mentioned here a few months ago from Ross Coulthart: that a certain too-large-to-move crashed object, residing in a place outside US control might get revealed if progress is not made.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This was a pleasant departure from the negative news and counter attacks that have dominated this topic lately.

I’ve been a fan of Danny Sheehan since the 80s. He was one of the principal people that revealed the Iran Contra scandal among his other feats revealing hidden truths.

I do hope he and Basset are right that Disclosure is all but a given and also very imminent (according to the Schumer timeline that Sheehan cites).

2024 might just be the year!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

it’s heartening that the governor has been working so hard to solve the state’s crippling housing crisis…oh wait…what?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

well the combo of a witness to the Gimbal incident who then learns about how many sightings the navy sees only to be visited in his bedroom by NHI…that’s got my attention!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sometimes I pause when I read about how hard some military leadership is trying to stop disclosure. If all of this is just weapons testing then, okay, that makes normal sense. If it’s because there is a ton of graft, then, wow, that’s still a story. But what if it’s just really disturbingly bad news and they really are trying to stop a well-founded risk of global panic.

Still, call me Pandora, but i still want to know…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

exactly…woah.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Those DOE contractors…interesting bedfellows there…particularly in Nevada.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The 2023 RAND study on the tendency for UAP to be seen in remote areas is interesting. But then again, it could also be a case of seeing things more clearly since there is less ‘noise’ in the sky outside population centers.

Moreover this article strikes me as just applying humanity’s latest tech to the UAP problem.

Personally, I’m tending toward Vallee’s hypothesis that the stealthiness has more to do with extra dimensionality of the phenomenon. That is, the way UAP blink in and out of sight and the often reported combining of multiple objects into one, or vis versa, is better explained if UAP are multidimensional in nature. They might still be extraterrestrial probes, but they could be something far weirder.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

yeah, that was an interesting moment. I think he was purposely being vague so only he really knows, but I’d wager it has to do with the weirder, reality-bending revelations that are floated out there:

  1. the DNA sharing thing
  2. we’re all a hologram
  3. they’re dinosaur gods from an alternative timeline (joking)

essentially the thing or things that will make us say: “I wish it was just aliens!”

 

This was on the front page. Hopefully the beginning of a trend at WaPo.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

From my conversations with mainland Chinese, they often tout the line that the US was somehow involved, so it was partly an excusable defense of the homeland against dangerously co-opted students. That said, most acknowledge that it was pretty bad. But these are also well-educated Chinese working abroad, so I assume the majority of Chinese don’t know much.

One story I heard retold by an English teacher working in Nanjing that I used to know was about the experience of one of the people involved in the protests…or at least they were an academic in Beijing at the time of the massacre. They were really depressed 20 years later and felt that nobody around them, particularly their students, knew anything.

view more: next ›