zmkart

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

Here here...the new version is a poor relation of the old...but we seem to be stuck with it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not according to the stats on the bottom right of the page.

 

Just looked at the stats & I see that the users have dropped from 111 to 69 this week...i've been away for a week and was hoping things may have improved on here in that time - they haven't - still painfully slow,still a lot worse than the previous version...not good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Seems daft if there's some sort of ban on using/recognising "celebrity" faces..inevitable that at some point they'll find their way back onto the system so why not just put it back to how it was before this wretched update.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

In the meantime how many who loved the old version are going to give up on this new version - the incredibly slow waiting speeds for images to generate & over complicated way of using this version (compared to the simplicity of the previous version) are very off putting...am I better off coming back in 6 months (or longer)...?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Fair enough - I hate to complain but for me the site was perfect as it was - if in 6 months it's as good as it was then great - but it's a long time to wait though to get back to where we were!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes but it's not just the fact that it no longer recognises "celebs",it's the fact that some of the old styles are nothing like they were - tintin comic,franco/belgian comic,50s enamel sign,vintage comic,vintage pulp art etc etc are now Nothing like they were or are anywhere near as good..how is this progress?..surely these styles should've stayed as they were even if there is some sort of new engine running this site.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Personally speaking It's become useless to me..whether that will change in 6 months,who knows?..just feels like it's gone backwards..what happens if we all get used to this version then he decides to "upgrade" it again & we're back to square one?..sometimes new isn't always better.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ok,but what is the reason for this update if it's putting us all back who knows how many months..all seems a bit daft to say the least.

 

Any suggestions?..I don't mind if they're paid for sites/apps.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

"Months" though!!!....how is this an improvement?...seems like we've gone so far backwards.

 

Why is it not recognising celebrity/famous names when trying to input them into the prompt box?...I did type in "Taylor Swift" yesterday (simply because she's so well known) & after waiting an age got something resembling her,but just tried "River Phoenix" and got firstly a woman then an actual phoenix...is this because the whole thing has started from scratch?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes it was great for that sort of thing...I can only hope that in a few months it will have learned what "celebs" look like when trying to get a resemblance...the old version used to nail most of them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

The thing is it's taking SO long to wait for just 2 images that i'm not prepared to wait just to see how wrong it is...the old version would create dozens of images in seconds.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm guessing it's cost money to make these changes BUT if I had a website that users absolutely loved then changed it and "most" users hated those changes,i'd change it back in an instant..."the customer is always right" (D-Fens).

 

I'm gutted at what's happened to this site...for me it was arguably the best website i've ever used in 25+ years of using the internet...such a shame...I really hope that just for once somebody listens to the complaints & puts things back as they were,otherwise it's useless to me.

view more: next ›