this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
736 points (100.0% liked)

me_irl

5647 readers
931 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Real talk the lack of caller id for all businesses or government lines is insane.

If you are not making a private call, on a private line, the I'd should be populated

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The bigger issue here is spam calls.

If that shit was stopped, people wouldn't ignore unknown callers.

While your solution is good it only solves part of the problem.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

No, if a company was calling me and I didn't want to talk to them, I'd still be better informed with caller id.

A spam call would be ignored because I wouldn't recognize the business name

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Many countries have this. It’s just just shitty American carriers that hold us back by gating anything and everything behind a fee.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Actually, in this case, it's partially the opposite.

The Madison River Telephone Company (later CenturyLink and now Lumen) started blocked calls and services from Vonage (VOIP) in 2005 because VOIP was a threat. The FCC stepped in and ruled against Madison River in what was really the beginning of Net Neutrality legislation.

Their ruling established that phone carriers couldn't discriminate against other services accessing their network and its features. Among those features is Caller ID. Since any. VOIP phone system doesn't actually originate from a telephone exchange, so they all essentially have to "spoof" their Caller ID.

The phone companies can't block CallerID spoofing from spamme4s and scammers without violating a 20yo ruling from the FCC.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

which is extremely outdated, with proper called ID these spoofed numbers should be presented as such on the caller ID

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The problem is there is legitimate reason to spoof CID.

VOIP is one. I also have the ability to do it when I make a call from my work cell to have it display the city switchboard so people both aren't calling me when I'm off duty, but also so that the people receiving calls see a call from the City, not from some random dude.

[–] person420 6 points 2 months ago

The issue is with cell phones and mobile networks. They don't all support passing CNAM (caller name delivery) between them. I worked in telecom for over 15 years, dealt with only businesses, I never met a company that didn't have CNAM set up.