this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
738 points (100.0% liked)

me_irl

5997 readers
497 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 104 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is what happens when you fail to reign in scam calls in any way for a decade plus.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Believe it or not, this is a perfect time to leave a voice mail. The not answering spam calls I am normalized with, but the refusal to use voice mail for important calls is inexcusable.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

I would not listen to it. Just send a text

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't have a voicemail set up specifically because I don't want to dial in to check it. If you're a real person just text me to get my attention.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Dialing into your voicemail isn't as common anymore. I think my carrier still allows me to do that, but mostly it's all handled on my phone nowadays

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dunno about other countries, but in Brazil you have to pay to listen to your voicemail

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's people out there who haven't disabled their voice mail? Wild...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Three decades, easily

[–] [email protected] 97 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm totally with the hiker on this one, and this illustrates why spam calls are more than just a nuisance.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yep. I’m lost, 2% battery left, I aint answering a call from an unknown number. Imagining dying of thirst having wasted your last battery on a telemarketing call.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Why didn’t they text? Cultural norms aside, texts usually go through more easily than calls in spotty areas. But yeah, I’ll take hypothermia and exposure over answering an unknown number any day.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you want to be rescued sub to my OnlyFans site.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Click this link to claim your unclaimed property and get rescued.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Modern search and rescue tools actually do send a text with a link to ping your exact location. The text is intended to be customized to the situation so they know it is legit.

Clark, your mother Martha is worried about you. You are not in trouble. Please contact Metropolis PD to let us know you are safe, or click this link to share your location so we can come get you.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

I know this trick, it's a virus

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Nice try hungry bear.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I'm more likely to answer a call than respond to a text, and i feel like this is the same for most people. Besides, why would rescuers send a text?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Age has nothing to do with it. You are still a boomer.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

As they say, boomer is a mentality.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

You’ll be in a nursing home a loooong time

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Why would a rescuers not text? Especially after trying to call...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

to reach you about your car insurance. are you fully aware of the high price of vehicle maintenance?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Porque no Los dos?

[–] [email protected] 72 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Real talk the lack of caller id for all businesses or government lines is insane.

If you are not making a private call, on a private line, the I'd should be populated

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The bigger issue here is spam calls.

If that shit was stopped, people wouldn't ignore unknown callers.

While your solution is good it only solves part of the problem.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

No, if a company was calling me and I didn't want to talk to them, I'd still be better informed with caller id.

A spam call would be ignored because I wouldn't recognize the business name

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Many countries have this. It’s just just shitty American carriers that hold us back by gating anything and everything behind a fee.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Actually, in this case, it's partially the opposite.

The Madison River Telephone Company (later CenturyLink and now Lumen) started blocked calls and services from Vonage (VOIP) in 2005 because VOIP was a threat. The FCC stepped in and ruled against Madison River in what was really the beginning of Net Neutrality legislation.

Their ruling established that phone carriers couldn't discriminate against other services accessing their network and its features. Among those features is Caller ID. Since any. VOIP phone system doesn't actually originate from a telephone exchange, so they all essentially have to "spoof" their Caller ID.

The phone companies can't block CallerID spoofing from spamme4s and scammers without violating a 20yo ruling from the FCC.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

which is extremely outdated, with proper called ID these spoofed numbers should be presented as such on the caller ID

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] person420 6 points 3 months ago

The issue is with cell phones and mobile networks. They don't all support passing CNAM (caller name delivery) between them. I worked in telecom for over 15 years, dealt with only businesses, I never met a company that didn't have CNAM set up.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't expect rescuers to be calling me (assuming this is legit), so yeah, I probably wouldn't answer either

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Cmon, of course they would. They use every tool available and the phone is right there.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago

"every tool available" okay text me then

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Well then since they presumably got the missing person's number from someone that knows them and knows they were missing, maybe they should've called from that person's phone

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 months ago

In this day and age, people should learn how to text. That guy almost had to have an awkward voice conversation. 😳

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

....Dear Trevon, we've been trying to reach you about your car insurance..

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I will pay extra and tip the rescuers if they txt me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So a guy is lost and has phone service? Why didn’t he just call out for help? Never mind the whole issue of not answering unknown numbers. He had service and didn’t use his phone? This whole story is BS.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

90% of missing hikers get lost in serviced areas.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

I mean, did they leave a voicemail?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›