this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
303 points (100.0% liked)

News

27787 readers
4009 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • The Center Square: Federal employees reportedly told to remove pronouns from email signatures.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

It says email signatures.

And good; it's ridiculous, virtue-signalling bullshit and you've got to let it go.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It’s useful for people with unisex names like Taylor, Chris, or Jordan, especially in email, where you may not have any face-to-face contact.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or for people with names from cultures not associated with English naming standards such as Chinese or Indian cultures working in western companies or governments.

Pop quiz anti-pronouners! 星辰 Xīng Chén, girl or boy? 美莉 Měi Lì, girl or boy?? Would you like to buy a pronoun now?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

The first is male, the second is female, but I study Chinese so that's not very fair of me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, that's a reasonable position.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You fuckers need to let your vice-signaling go. Funny how "freedom" to ignore pronouns quickly gives way to banning them. The only freedom you guys seem to care about is the freedom to be ignorant pieces of shit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, turns out reality is more nuanced than that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And good; it’s ridiculous, virtue-signalling bullshit and you’ve got to let it go.

You're expressing a VERY strong negative reaction on words in an email signature. Why are you so threatened by what someone puts in their email signature? How does it challenge or change what you are that you've put so much thought into it to get this angry about it?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because it's very, very silly identity politics and the majority of people agree. You've got to let it go and focus on important things, like the insane and ever-increasing wealth inequality.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Identity politics for email signatures? There was no federal policy around email signatures like this until folks like you decided to make it politics forcing removal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah yes, folks like me, of course.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Do you find my statement offensive? Are you not celebrating this new policy? How would you not be folks that share your mindset be like you?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I don't know if celebrating is the right word. I'm not American and would never have voted for Trump, but in isolation this seems fairly benign and I think a majority of people will be glad to hear it. You might disagree, that's fine, I'm not interested in an extended argument about it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm been told that it is not just virtue-signaling (it is), but that it is also a virtue (allyship) in action. Normalizing sharing that information make it easier for people that have a more complex relationship with their gender than I do.