55
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

r/RetroGaming is very strict about retro. They say the Nintendo 64 is retro while the PlayStation 2 is modern. This despite the fact the PlayStation 2 is now 25 years old.

So I got to wonder about this community deems as “retro”.

Or a better question: what’s considered retro and not retro? What’s the fine line between retro and modern?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Anything that needs to be played on a CRT.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Playing Super Mario Bros. on Switch = "not retro."

[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Old games don’t need to be played on a CRT any more than modern games need to be played on an OLED/LCD flat panel.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Then how about anything that plays better on a CRT vs a modern flat screen? Older games were absolutely made with CRT artifacts in mind and look worse on newer screens.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

They'll lag if you don't.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I'd say, at 50, imo anything 32 bit and below is retro but there needs to be a new name for the "old" stuff that is 64bit

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
55 points (100.0% liked)

RetroGaming

24107 readers
59 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS