this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
528 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

11174 readers
1082 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I don't own or want a car. My housemate drives me to work. It's a 7 minute drive, 50 minutes by public transport. You need to put on 10 minute buses on multiple routes through every suburb 24hrs to make public transport a viable option for most people.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The problem with transit is more about how cities are designed, zoned, and built. If we built cities for people instead of cars the vast majority of people in a city would likely have faster commutes on transit than driving a private vehicle.

Other things can help with this as well such as transit signal priority.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's a 7 minute drive, i practically live in the same suburb. I also work evening shift. Are you going to put on a bus to everywhere for those 250 people who finish work at 230am? Must all of us work and live next door? I try to live as close as possible but you cant ask everyone to do that. A job change shouldnt mean you are required to move house. Its just not feasible for a city of millions to move every time they change jobs. And its not feasible to put on a bus service so me and a couple of others can get home at 230am.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You're right, it isn't feasible to always use a bus, thats why walking, cycling, trams, and light rail should also be used. The biggest problem is density. Low density makes it very difficult to effeciently service, yet many north american zoning and building codes make it very difficult to build any housing that isn't detached single family homes with minimum parking standards and set backs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

She's afraid to be out alone at night. Biking infra isn't going to change her mind.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

walking, cycling, trams, and light rail

Ableism much? These options don’t suit a bunch of people.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Ableism much?

No. There are many more disabilities that prevent operation of a car compared to using a train or tram, so the status quo of car supremacy is far more ableist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No one said the individual being accommodated had to be the one operating the vehicle.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

@Cypher @Hawke So if you were to lose your vision or develop epilepsy tomorrow, you would prefer to be dependent on family, friends, or personal servants to drive you everywhere rather than having options of accessible trains and buses and being able to walk to nearby destinations safely?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would absolutely prefer a private chauffeur given that I find the general public to be imbecilic disgusting wastes of time and oxygen.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Advocates against ablism then calls the general public imbecilic disgusting wastes of oxygen.....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not at all. I’m 100% onboard (pun intended) with trains and buses and trams.

Not sure where you got the idea that I wasn’t.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're replying to a Mastodon user whose pinging system works differently than Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah, thanks. So if I understand right, that was more of a “replying to one person but also wanting to notify another person of the reply” is that it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

That's probably the intention behind the design, but drag thinks that Mastodon actually pings the last two people in the conversation by default.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Many trams and light rail are accessible for various disabilities.

Cars are also restrictive to people with certain disabilities. The fairest way is having a wide variety of options available, including specialized cars for those who need them. Currently, the car is pretty much the only option in many north american cities, which certainly isn't the fairest.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Options are good, ignoring the car as an option is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

I'm pretty sure people aren't ignoring cars as an option - the topic of discussion is excessive prevalence of cars, so the discussion is focused on the viability of alternatives.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Fuck cars. People who need them can drive electric microcars instead. Like in the Netherlands.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As a disabled person, drag is perfectly capable of using all of those options, but can't drive a car. You're trying to use drag's identity as a weapon to make drag's life worse. Knock it off!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Ahh yes the identity of ‘disabled’ that is owned by you.

but can’t drive a car.

Absolute shocker that.

Knock it off!

Go knock yourself off.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Oh cool we just need to tear down and rebuild the cities.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You say that as if we didn't already do it once before, when we demolished perfectly-good walkable downtowns to pave over them for car parking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but then it was actually politically viable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're a voter. You get to help decide what's politically viable. Giving up makes no sense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’ve been voting for 25 years and not once have I felt any damn influence

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not just your votes, it's also your actions and your words. For example, when you say green transport policy will never happen, you're making it less likely, and undoing your votes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I don’t disagree that my comments on a backwater social media site for nerds are more influential than my vote.

Still never gonna happen.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thats pretty much exactly what we did to accommodate cars with their highways and parking lots in the first place. But its really less about tearing down and more about building up instead of out. They already tore down the cities to pave more lanes and make more parking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So assuming we have as much buy in from government at all levels as we did for highways and parking lots we might have walkable cities in 50 years.

And that’s a huge assumption.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is a huge problem cause we had great functional cities with lots of housing and most had trams on every majory roadway. We made huge mistakes destroying multi story buildings to pave surface level parking lots. This problem was decades in the making and will take decades to build out of, but thats what we'll have to do if we want to fix it. There is no magic undo button.

Things cities can do to start improving today inckude upzone residential neighbourhoods to make midrise multi units possible to build. Allows mixed use zoning where residential moxes more with light comercial and restaurants. Restrict new developments on the edges of the city to meet minimum density requirements and transit access standards. Update fire/building codes to make single staircase buildings safe and viable. Do a street assement when repaving roads to determine if dedicated transit, cycling, or pedestrian lanes should replace some car lanes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Anything that takes decades to do is no longer possible in America. At best we get four years of progress and then four to eight years of stagnation, if not actual regression.

Saying things like “oh just do this” ignores the complete lack of political will to do this at every level from the voters to the presidency.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Nearly everything i mentioned can be done at a municipal level which tends to have less extreme shifts than federal politics. A good city council could commit to improving their city's situation. Often once this gets started, people like it. For example, people loved the pedestrianized streets some cities had during covid. I do understand your point though, the premier of my province made it illegal for municipalities to build bike lanes (which imo is way too much provincial over reach into muncipal planning).

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Or design cities to have better bike lanes, light rail, etc.

It's really hard to imagine in most US cities, and it was hard to believe when I lived there.

I'm in a very commuting-friendly place now and the small towns having easy access to good public transport is just reality, and it feels fantastic.

I hope someday more places will adopt that type of design mentality

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a good bicycle ride away.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Im a woman and i finish work at 230am. Im not going to expose myself to the risk of riding a bike home. If i worked day shift that would be ok but its just not safe for me to bike home at that hour.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Risk of what? Getting run over? It's actually better since 2:30 AM = less traffic. Getting assaulted and/or abducted? Good luck for would-be criminals catching up with you on foot. Even if they're in a car, they usually have to get out of it in order to do their stuff and that limits them to running speed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're an idiot. Criminals see patterns and take advantage. If i walk through the same streets and park every night and they see me every night they can easily predict my behaviour and take advantage. I have a decent paying job, plenty of money and a vagina. I am at risk. Grow the fuck up.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Most criminals are capitalists.

Most people who commit crimes the police would consider crimes are drug addicts, poor, or preying on people they already know - like spousal rapists and pedophile priests.

Since you don't have to worry about the third category any more on a bike than in a car, that leaves people who are poor, desperate, and have compromised judgement. They ain't setting an ambush and waiting all night to catch you. They're shoplifting and stealing catalytic converters. Your hoo-hah ain't a bank vault.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

i finish work at 230am.

Maybe should've start with that next time, people would've understand it because public transport tend to not run at midnight. And your situation is unique, so i'm not sure why you need to compare both cases.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

How much of that is highway?