this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
1419 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

7141 readers
1162 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 month ago (13 children)

all the people who refused to vote for kamala must be so pleased with how little palestinian genocide is about to happen. aren't they? well? aren't they?

no?

gee it sure sounds like their whole little plan backfired in the worst possible way come to think of it, ACTUALLY.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's almost like it could have been easily predicted

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

If only people had been talking about exactly what happened for months leading up to the election, maybe it would have gone differently.......

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yep. As soon as I heard her stance on Israel, I got a sinking feeling. There was such hope and enthusiasm at first, but she just had to pander to AIPAC.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The nuanced stance that Israel, an ally, was attacked and had a right to defend itself but that they shouldn’t cause a humanitarian crisis in Gaza?

That she was committed to a two state solution?

That she consistently called for ceasefires all of last year?

Y’all got played if you think Harris was pandering to AIPAC.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

What good is calling for a ceasefire if there's no leverage? Netanyahu ignored Biden's calls for a ceasefire because he knew that Biden would just back down if he ignored it. Harris was the same. You can call for ceasefires until you're blue in the face, but if Netanyahu can just say "Naw", and nothing happens, then what good is it?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She also muzzled Walz and started being super corporatist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be honest, my prediction was "parking lot", so the whole "riviera" concept was a surprising development.

The ethnic cleansing was obvious, tho.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

My prediction was glass but I guess they’re accomplishing their goals just fine without nukes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Stop blaming the voters for kamala's bad decisions.

she threw her campaign when her campaign chose to abandon the very vocal block of anti-genocide voters who had enough votes to swing the election.

if your campaign can only succeed if several millions of people to change their minds suddenly, you ran a losing campaign from the beginning.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It’s the voters who voted for Trump. It’s that simple.

Although I didn’t have ”Trump ending the Israel Palestine conflict by making Palestine American” on my bingo card, it was always super obvious that Trump is way more pro Israel than Kamala. If you thought otherwise you didn’t pay attention at all.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, but blaming then is obviously pointless. It makes sense to blame the ones that could have prevented this: the Democratic Party and the ones who didn't vote democrat.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think you can just blame the democratic party. People shouldn't be blamed for not voting for garbage genocidal candidates and their wacky condescending fanboys.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It doesn't matter how good or bad her campaign was. All people in swing states who were able to vote but didn't or voted third party have contributed to Trump's victory.

If your election system requires you to vote tactically, you have no choice but to vote tactically.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If the election system requires tactical voting then it isn't a democracy.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No you're right. America only pretends to be a democracy, but it most definitely is not. The electoral college alone causes some people's votes to be more important than others. Then there's the first-past-the-post system where you only need 50% of the votes to get 100% of the electors, which screws up things even more. And finally, many people are unable to cast their vote in the first place. Nothing about that is democratic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

And not participating in it is improving it somehow?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Actually, for that matter, I DO actually want to incorporate your point.

The problem is the proverbial horse died of thirst.

You're right in that it's not correct for me to simply leave it at "you can lead the horse to water but you can't make it drink", because the truth is SHE DIDN'T LEAD THE FUCKING HORSE TO WATER AT ALL IN THE FIRST PLACE!

She silently held up a sign that said "maybe water"

Trump held up a sign that said "no water for anyone except you" (which was patently a LIE, there was never any water at all with him) while also making beckoning noises and holding a sugar cube in his other hand.

The fact that the horse literally couldn't even read in the first place doesn't change the fact that she didn't do her fucking job and that he used empty populist rhetoric to lure the horse to a place where there definitely was NEVER going to be any water whatsoever.

We tried to nudge the horse to where there might have been water. But it's just a dumb fucking animal and wanted sugar cubes. Now it's dead (and it didn't even get the sugar cube it was being bribed with) and

...

yeah. We have better shit to do than keep beating this dead horse. It's too late for it to learn anything.

So, departing from that metaphor, in a very real sense I've been making preparations to help people survive and perhaps someday even evacuate. Complaining about the circumstances is not the ONLY thing I'm doing, not by a long shot. But I do complain. Because I'm stressed and need to release the metaphorical pressure.

If you know of any mutual aid groups starting up to construct an underground railroad now that the horse is dead and we have to rely on ourselves, I'd sure like to know.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Dawg, the democratic party failed to energize it's base by running a center right campaign with a platform of strong boarders, a strong military, and tax cuts. Them failing to get enough votes is there fault for trying to beat voters with the cudgel of trump while offering nothing to most working families. I voted for Kamala, and even I recognize this. I am really tired of seeing a comment like this every time there's a post about trump. The election is over. Rhetoric like this only divides the left further.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Imagine thinking democracy is only your duty if you feel energized by the candidate.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Imagine being a Democracy and deliberately running an unpopular campaign so the financiers keep the money spigot on.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Completely irrelevant because

  1. This is what "forcing" the democrats to make a change looks like, all it will ever do is shift the overton window to the right and make things even worse.
  2. What really lost the democrats the election was years of gerrymandering, voter suppression and making it just difficult as fuck to vote in Dem areas.
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Actually I'm starting to feel convinced the Democrats saw "The Producers" as inspiration.

"You can make more money with a ~~flop~~loss than a ~~hit~~win!"

As long as they keep losing elections, they can keep making money disappear (via laundering it). They sop up all the donations and laugh all the way to the bank, burning LITERAL BILLIONS OF DOLLARS on their cousin-in-law's "strategy consulting firm" and tons of completely ineffectual "vote blue" spam, and pay themselves six-figure "speaking fees".

The solution isn't to just stop voting, though. Voting is merely the least inconvenient, easiest to access tool in the toolbox and the people who left it unused are morons no matter how much ELSE they are doing ABOVE AND BEYOND that. Voting is the bare minimum; you have to do that AND local party organizing, civics, community engagement, nominating candidates for local races.

But if you don't vote TOO, it's like you neglected to wipe your ass. The stink follows you and embarrasses everyone with you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Rhetoric like this only divides the left further.

Liberals aren't left, and the democratic party served its purpose to a T. These people who continue to defend it are too. Both of their purpose is to shift the overton window all the way in to fascism, which they are doing successfully, and have no reason to stop (until the fascist come for them, at which point they will wonder why no one is interested in or even around to help them).

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I see an awful lot of people post-justifying doing nothing as some form of radical resistance.

Well, sure, maybe it is resistance, and maybe they have a clear conscience... But it didn't do a fucking thing, did it?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (15 children)

their whole little plan backfired

Was there a plan in the first place? It would've looked like this:

  1. Don't vote Kamala
  2. Trump wins election
  3. ???
  4. No profit at all, everything's fucked
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
  1. Vote Cornel West because he's an ok person who opposes genocide.
  2. It doesn't matter at all because of where I live in this sham democracy.
  3. Continue to be berated by delusional genocidal libs for the rest of my life.
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  1. Vote Kamala
  2. Trump does not win election
  3. There's still hope for a better future
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  1. Politics doesn’t end on Election Day. Continue to pressure Kamala over the genocide
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

exactly, and she's gonna take human rights into consideration way more than Trump ever will

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If I were running for office, it would be easy to say no to genocide. Why wouldn't Harris do that?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Republicans would just spin the narrative by accusing her of being antisemetic (aka a Nazi).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So people should support genocide so that genocidal people don't call them anti-semetic?

That's a root of the problem. People were called anti-german for opposing the nazis.

I'm not voting for somebody who's too scared or brainwashed to oppose genocide.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, the problem is stupid people. Stupid people who are incapable of understanding nuance. Like you, for example, that can’t understand the nuances of navigating an unfortunate reality. You, who can’t comprehend voting for the lesser of two evils, and instead will allow a psychopathic fascist to take over because you can’t navigate nuance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

genocide is about to happen.

lmao libs waking up after over a year... acting like they suddenly give a shit about an ongoing genocide.

This is why y'all keep losing. Literally offering nothing but vile condescension.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Laughing at people caring about genocide is a strange position to take. And not an especially moral one.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

They'll take no such responsibility. People are stupid and it's time to stop pretending. It's time to stop coddling stupid people, it only emboldens them.

load more comments (4 replies)