this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
199 points (100.0% liked)

Global News

3728 readers
177 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added tothe title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tariffs aside, regulations mean the EU rarely imports certain US products, such as meat and dairy.

Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://theconversation.com/eu-consumers-dont-trust-us-goods-a-look-into-trumps-trade-deficit-claims-249315


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The EU’s so-called “higher standards” are just another layer of bureaucratic theater designed to placate its own citizens while hiding the rot underneath

Absolute counterfactual nonsense.

Sure, they slap a fancy label on their food policies, but it’s not about protecting people—it’s about protecting markets.

In the case of protected origin (like how you can't call it feta if it's not from Greece and you can't call it champagne of it's not from the Champagne district etc), sure.

That's wholly separate from food safety regulations, though, which are vital for protecting the public from corporations destroying their health.

The precautionary principle? A shield for their agricultural lobby to keep out competition under the guise of safety.

Again, absolute counterfactual nonsense.

Meanwhile, the US isn’t poisoning anyone

Bullshit. Corporations are actively choosing less healthy and more addictive ingredients for their products because they're allowed to. That's not even debatable to anyone who's arguing in good faith and knows the first thing about food safety.

It's becoming increasingly clear that you're arguing in bad faith, arguing based on ignorance, arguing based on misinformation, or more than one of the above.

Both systems are broken, but let’s not pretend one is morally superior

I wouldn't say that the EU is IN GENERAL morally superior, but protecting the public from being poisoned at the whim of cost cutting corporations empirically IS morally superior to not doing so. Only corporations trying not get away with it and the truly deluded would disagree.

The EU’s smugness over “standards” is laughable when they’re still importing slave-labor goods and dumping waste in Africa

While yes, that's inarguably reprehensible, that has exactly nothing to do with food safety regulations or the lack thereof.

It’s all hypocrisy dressed up as policy

Just stfu already. That the EU does reprehensible things in other areas doesn't make the concept of food safety regulations a sham. That's obvious to any honest person not blinded by a binary world view of "either everything they do is good or everything they do is bad"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Counterfactual nonsense? That’s rich coming from someone parroting the EU’s PR like it’s gospel. You think protected origin labels are “wholly separate” from market control? Laughable. They’re literally designed to monopolize markets under the guise of tradition. Keep pretending it’s about safety while ignoring how it stifles competition.

Your corporate poisoning tirade is a joke. The EU imports the same junk, just wrapped in fancier packaging. But sure, let’s blame the US for everything while ignoring Europe’s complicity. That’s some next-level selective outrage.

And your moral superiority shtick? Hilarious. Slave labor and dumping waste don’t magically disappear because you slap a “higher standards” sticker on your policies. Hypocrisy isn’t a virtue, no matter how smugly you wear it.

As for “stfu”? Cute. Resorting to playground insults when your arguments collapse under scrutiny is exactly what I’d expect from someone out of their depth.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, by your standards you gotta be perfect or the devil themself with no in-between?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah, the classic false dichotomy—perfect or devil, no in-between. Convenient oversimplification for someone dodging the actual critique. Standards aren’t about sainthood; they’re about consistency. If you’re going to preach “higher values,” maybe don’t turn a blind eye to the contradictions in your own backyard.

This isn’t about moral absolutism; it’s about calling out hypocrisy masquerading as virtue. If you can’t handle that without retreating into reductive nonsense, maybe rethink engaging in a debate that demands nuance.

And while we’re at it, reducing everything to “standards” doesn’t absolve you from addressing the systemic issues behind them. But sure, keep playing the victim of impossible expectations—it’s easier than grappling with inconvenient truths.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a whole lotta words to say yes

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, the classic "too many words" deflection—because brevity is apparently the hallmark of intellectual rigor now? Sorry if nuance doesn’t fit into your preferred soundbite format, but some ideas require more than a monosyllabic grunt to unpack.

If you’re allergic to complexity, maybe stick to simpler conversations. But don’t mistake your inability to engage for someone else’s verbosity. Not every argument can be reduced to a meme or a quip, no matter how much you wish it could.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I've got an incense burner, you know how those work? You need a small ember to create the most smoke, much like how your vapid nonsense conceals the least important, interesting, or, yes, nuanced position this side of Twitter. You think progress doesn't exist unless we immediately go to your perfect world. No matter how you dress it up we all get exactly what you're saying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Market control protects the euros from the despicable imperialist genocidal poison-eating yankkkkkkks