this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
1741 points (100.0% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2852 readers
1299 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You guys love the appeal to authority fallacy. You don't need to be an expert to know you shouldn't still be using programs written in cobol.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If relying on any knowledge is bad, then why should we believe what you say? That's an appeal to authority

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I didn't say any knowledge. I'm saying if you reject what someone says only because they don't have some arbitrary experience that you require. That's an appeal to authority

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Why should anyone listen to what you have to say? Can you give a reason without an appeal to authority?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

So spend a chunk of money to hire a team to upgrade the database that's working to one that's programmed in a new language, ~~might~~ will have errors, then have to fix those errors, and you'd also have to train the existing team or replace them with someone who knows how to use and maintain the new database. You'd potentially want to upgrade or change the hardware too from an old mainframe computer unless you want to only sidegrade to like C-90 since your old IBM computer won't support newer compilers. In the meanwhile there's a HUGE risk of breaking something or even just not getting anything accomplished

It's definitely an objective that's good but if you're chasing efficiency and cutbacks, it's the opposite of what you'd want to do.