this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
526 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24288 readers
2684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Protesters at a Kootenai County Republican Central Committee town hall in Idaho were forcibly removed after criticizing Trump policies, including the Elon Musk-led DOGE.

Event organizers dismissed their concerns, with one emcee saying, "Your voice is meaningless."

Similar protests occurred in Georgia and Oklahoma, where Republicans faced criticism over mass layoffs.

Lawsuits have been filed against the administration over the legality of these dismissals.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Violence is never the answer.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tell that to those rescued from the Nazi death camps, and the enslaved people freed from bondage by the Civil War.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Remember it used to be the rule that the conversation was over once someone mentioned Nazis?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No? Why wouldn't we be allowed to talk about the filthy nazis who are destroying the United States as we speak?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I was referring to Godwin's law not the government that the majority of American voters elected.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Didn't Hitler also have the "peoples mandate" as the fucking fascist trash looooove to keep repeating?

Just baaaarely over half the voting public. If one were to trust that Elon and the other traitors didn't fuck with the votes.

Seeing how they're acting now, I don't believe for a second that 2024 was legitimate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

No, Hitler did NOT have a people’s mandate. He had about 30% or less. Which interestingly seems to be the 30% of the population who are inherently authoritarian according to Altemeyer’s “The Authoritarians” book.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’ve heard the ‘they stole the vote’ line from the republicans too ever since Biden won.

They didn’t fuck with the vote, eighty million people decided they didn’t care if Trump won so they sat on their asses on Election Day.

I’m not the one you should be mad at.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They didn’t fuck with the vote

They certainly did fuck with the voters, though - there was an absurd amount of well documented disenfranchisement leading up to this election. You can believe what you want to believe, but I choose to believe that if everyone who in previous elections had been eligible to vote had been allowed to this time, too, the result would have been different.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You’re not wrong there but the leftists fucked with the voters just as hard.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can you provide sources for what you're referring to?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Did you not see anything where the ‘progressives’ were calling Biden genocide Joe and saying Harris was the exact same?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, absolutely, but that's propaganda, not voter suppression. I wasn't even mentioning the propaganda, of which there was a vast amount of both for Trump and against Harris.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That propaganda had the effect of suppressing voting.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's a difference between propaganda convincing people not to vote vs. voter suppression legally preventing them from doing so. Like it or not, I think propaganda is an inescapable reality of the world we live in, and I don't see any way to stop it without also suppressing speech. Truth in reporting laws would certainly help, but a huge amount of it is disseminated via social media by users.

Laws removing the ability to vote from a population that disproportionately skews politically in one direction or who are disproportionately of specific ethnicities is far more insidious and should be preventable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Laws removing the ability to vote from a population that disproportionately skews politically in one direction or who are disproportionately of specific ethnicities is far more insidious and should be preventable.

I have no proof or sources to back me up but I feel voter suppressing propaganda is as big of a problem but nevertheless eighty million eligible votes didn't exercise their rights to do so and that's almost inexcusable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I feel voter suppressing propaganda is as big of a problem

I agree with you that it's a huge problem; I'm just not sure we have a simple / viable solution. Elon Musk can post something on Twitter that's verifiably, indisputably wrong, and you can have 100,000 people posting hard evidence proving that it's wrong, but Elon's reach is greater than all 100k of them combined. It's essentially impossible to counter social media propaganda as a result, and that was the case even before he owned the platform it's being disseminated on.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

If you don't want people coming up with the easiest counterexample, don't say "never".

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree violence should never be the answer but when the people in charge control everything from justice to every part of gouvernement little choice remain

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How many guns do you have where you think you can take on ‘every part of the government?’.

Violence isn’t the answer but voting the next chance you have is.

More people should have voted in 2024 and this wouldn’t be a problem.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You don't take on every part of the government dumbass. Insurgencies aren't like that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree violence should never be the answer but when the people in charge control everything from justice to every part of gouvernement little choice remain

This is the comment I was replying to.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

What "little choice remains" means is that your choices are defending your rights or capitulating.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It sure got rid of the nazis last time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

World War II had fifty to eighty-five million fatalities with just over four million dead Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Clearly we should have just caved to hitler, since violence is never the answer.

Caving to the right is always the centrist answer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If world war two got rid of all the Nazis why are we still battling them?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Because they still have appeasers to take advantage of. You don't want to do anything to oppose them now, either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Violence isn't the only way to oppose something that's the mistake you're making with your argument.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Violence isn’t the only way to oppose something that’s the mistake you’re making with your argument.

It's the only effective way against some things.

Centrists see fascism and either want to toady up and appease it, or want to collaborate.