this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
485 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

10902 readers
300 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (18 children)

I get they want to keep their talents and jobs. But it's just not viable for the future and it has nothing to do with cost.

The future is RPG games where the NPC's can generate their responses in real time and not in text way, but fully voiced. There is no pre-loading responses. The future is curated content responding to the player.

So to achieve that, its either a fully generated voice like a vocaloid or you train an AI on someone's voice.

If the voice actors aren't interested in it being their voice, they'll find someone or go vocaloid.

It's not about saving money. It's about pre-recorded voice lines being dead on arrival.

Think audio books, but choose your own adventure audio books, where all the names/places/things can be curated to the listener. Voice Actor isn't going to be apart of that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Obviously you get downvoted, but just as obviously this is the future. Nonsense static responses are useless, having actual responses that match what happens would take immersion to a whole new level.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Oh yeah, that's why nobody reads regular fiction anymore, it's all choose-your-adventure these days.

Bots will never be able to act as well as humans do until they are literally sentient. They might sometimes sound like someone naturally speaking, but they will never be able to intonate the correct emotion the way we do. They will never be able to make creative decisions and work with a director. And they will never be able to hold a real conversation. ChatGPT and Deepseek can hold their own longer than Cleverbot did, but they still devolve into nonsense in short order. Zero chance they'll be able to hold together consistent fiction the way a human writing a script does.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This 'never' you speak of is already on its way. This is just the beginning.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)