this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
1205 points (100.0% liked)

World News

44686 readers
4957 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

After a tense Oval Office encounter with Donald Trump and JD Vance, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy received a warm UK welcome, including an official audience with King Charles at Sandringham.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer convened a defence summit with European and NATO allies to reaffirm solidarity with Ukraine, discuss unlocking frozen Russian assets, and counter the rift caused by Trump’s accusations of Zelenskyy’s ingratitude.

European leaders fear the spat endangers Western unity and peace efforts and are vowing no negotiations on Ukraine without Ukrainian involvement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

A lot of the "oh noes the US is losing influence" comes twofold from:

  1. General sinophobia as China is often seen as the next viable global superpower.

  2. Americans who deep down know exactly how good they've had it because of that influence and are suddenly scared that their own country could become the true corrupt, broke shithole it has always really been. We only ever had wealth because we dominated and stole it from the rest of the world.

I'm with you, US losing influence isn't a bad thing. It's only bad for US citizens, who need to get a grip on how comfortable and coddled they have really been, even if they are poor. US poor is not international poor, once again, because we stole so much wealth from the rest of the world. I say this as a US citizen who is daily disgusted by the selfishness and coddled ass attitudes of his fellow Americans.

A good example of why is how we took the worlds outpouring of compassion after 9/11 and squandered the fuck out of it by playing world police and killing untold millions in the middle east and Europe has been dealing with the aftermath for 20 fucking years now.

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

As someone living in Asia, the US losing influence is a really scary thing. China has been increasing their aggression in the region and the US's presence has always been the counter to that. It was a good balance but a weaker US will tip the balance to China's favour. Not to mention that the US has been a key factor in getting Korea and Japan to work together on security matters. Unfortunately, there's no EU or NATO equivalent for us to rely on.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly. I'm an Indian and I'd rather prefer USA as global superpower than China.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, tell the Filipinos or Taiwanese that the US going down is a good thing. China is constantly testing both country's sovereignty and waters.

I has maybe planned to retire to the Philippines with my wife, live out our days in her homeland. Now? Fuck.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 12 points 3 weeks ago

Unfortunately, there's no EU or NATO equivalent for us to rely on.

I would say this is a good time for you guys to make one. My home country is Canada, and I think it'd be great to see defensive pacts in both the Atlantic and Pacific - we'd be keen on joining both of them, I suspect. We're threatened by Chinese influence too.

[–] Cpo@lemm.ee 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As someone living in NATO area, I wish we would start NATO 2 without the US. They can effectively veto anything they want.

Time for a new collaboration.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn’t that what the EU is? What are the military aspects of being in the Union? I’ve only ever heard about the economic aspects.

[–] Cpo@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Eu is primarily an economic cooperation Although there are ideas for a shared army.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

As an eastern European who knows what it's like to have an angry belligerent neighbour next door, I feel for you. I don't have much to offer other than hoping you and yours continue to be ok, and hoping that nearby countries in similar situations can organize somewhat to help eachother.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago

I know its a daydream but this aussie would love to join the EU.
Maybe its time for an Eastern Union? IDK just thinking out loud.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

US losing influence isn’t a bad thing.

It does raise the risk of the USA doing desperate and destructive things, like starting a world war.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, power slipping from a collapsing empire run by an autocrat is usually a recipe for a series of senseless disasters, and bad news for everyone involved.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Personally I think we still have way too much to lose for that to come from the US. And we could lose half of what we have and still have more to lose than anyone. WW3 is much more likely to come from Russia, who have already lost everything they have and mostly look around the world and see what they have to gain.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Well put, I keep trying to tell our local racist shitheads to direct their anger for violence by PTSD refugees at the American administrations, not at foreigners. You can imagine how well that is (not) going...

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I agree that lots of US folk are too complacent and miseducated to be useful, and many of our biggest wishes is just trying to get grown adults to have even a shred of responsibility for themselves and those around them.

I think people generally were a bit less useless until corporate influence pushed its hardest to culture-breed a dumber and more subservient consumer-employee type of human being, and was mostly successful.

Paywalling and undercutting education being a massive factor here.

But "sinophobia"? LOL! No.

Willing to bet most people , aside from the usual suspects, are just fine with Chinese people and culture.

Anyone with sense should be afraid of Pooh-bear's CCP dominating global politics. A regime which tells the Chinese people what "their culture" is allowed to be, and forcibly injects itself into daily life.

Politically, judging by how they treated Hong Kong, and are currently treating (was gonna list but...dang that's a list.) ...every neighbor ...yeah that would be bad news.

This country isn't perfect, obviously. But I'd rather have the shred of a chance for us and other countries, that getting our shit together could change something for the better eventually.

You simply wouldn't get that chance with China or Russia holding dominating influence.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

US losing influence isn't a bad thing. It's only bad for US citizens

The US has ordered the world for 70ish years, for better and worse. When that dominance topples, everyone will be rolling the dice on wherever comes next. China is poised to gain from that. Name your favorite Western European nation and it’s much more of a toss-up. China’s neighbors are more likely to come out as China’s vassals. Thinking only the US have benefitted from the US led world order post WW2 is hilariously naive. You talk a good game, ready to rush into a future without it, but you are leading with the chin.