World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Is this good? For you guys? I hope so. Canada is now the guiding star.
He has a PhD in Economics and was the head of the Bank of Canada and more recently the head of the Bank of England. So yeah……can’t think of a better resume to navigate us through a trade war.
Worth noting he was head of Bank of Canada during the 08 crash and was pretty widely lauded for navigating it so well. So he's proven himself in a crisis.
Would I prefer someone further left? Of course, but as long as we live in a market economy we may as well have someone knowledgeable about it and who has at least expressed a desire to make it more fair.
According to this 2013 BBC article:
I don't know anything about him, but given the current economic climate, I'm skeptical. Hopefully he's good for Canada, and can deal with the economic catastrophe Trump is creating.
He at least won’t privatize your healthcare.
And actually just announced the full expansion of their dental plan by June. Not perfect since it's means-tested but that's going to be relief for many thousands of people
Compared to Pierre Poilievre (Maple MAGA forgone winner of the next election before Trudeau resigned)... 10000000000000x better
Overall? probably a bit better than usual
He's still the leader of the opposition. This wasn't an election between parties, this was the liberals choosing a new leader. We'll see if the Liberals can hold off the Conservatives before elections are here.
I just heard that many companies are simply eating the tariff costs and going us only....probably spiraling into a path leading to their eventual demise and the loss of investor money. All this will hurt everyone in the US at some point if not already. But its just gonna hit real hard.
Bank director as prime minister...
This will be bad in the long run.
There's going to be an election this year, so he may not be PM that long.
No, he pushed mass immigration, in order to derive what he calls economic growth as we trade homes back and forth for ever larger sums, as zoning and developer fees prevent new development.
Housing and rents doubled in 10 years as we did 4% population growth and bought 50% of mortgage bonds, all as he was a Liberal advisor. He's a champaign socialist like our NDP, and we have no real worker parties left.
If your rents doubled while your population increase was only 4%, it sounds like immigration wasn't the issue, now was it?
Blaming poor people for the housing bubble is like blaming a fish for the rain. Look up.
The problem is nimbyism, sprawled zoning, and large developer taxes used to lower property taxes; which is why matching immigration to housing completions is important, and an obvious thing to do if you care about the poor.
But people downvote criticism of their faux progressives. People got a whole 400$ in dental work as their rents doubled, wholly unfunded and paid with future austerity of course.
Matching population to available housing... Seems a little cart-before-the-horse. In your opinion what is the motivation to build housing, since we are controlling the demand not the supply?
There's always some being built but not ready to go, so depending on the exact requirement in place it doesn't exclude massive growth.
Actually, if it was literally letting in an immigrant family for every empty house on the market, you'd still get prices skyrocketing. To achieve the policy goal of continuing growth without sparking a cost crisis and a backlash, you have to leave room for domestic growth in demand, and maybe the effect of the other various push and pull factors on immigration. How exactly you do that, I don't know. It's probably pretty complicated.
Profits are why developers build housing, for consumers its an inelastic good obviously.
We have simply made land costs too valuable via regressive zoning and greenbelt, alongside the slow bureaucracy, poor mass transit. Then you have high developer taxes as I mentioned, which directly erode profit.
When supply is diminished and debt is cheap it becomes a liquidity sponge where supply doesnt increase to match capital, and people speculate on rising values like they do Bitcoin or gold, except with cheaply borrowed money that is insured and a liability to our own government as they buy half of all mortgage bonds.
I'm pretty sure Carney is onboard with tying immigration to housing. It seems like it's basically just consensus within Ottawa at this point.
To complete your argument, quote the increase in residential real estate too. If there was a >=4% increase in residential floor space and number of units, the problem definitely lies elsewhere
Our population increased by 10 million during Trudeau. As a homeowner I'm not complaining lol
It's just 4 million, actually. It was almost 36 million in 2015 and it's just over 40 now.
Because it increased house prices? I'm a home owner myself but fail to see how that's good for anyone; unless you own multiple properties.
I plan on selling my place here in BC when I turn 40 then I'm going to take over my family's acreage and retire.
Fair enough, must be nice, but you'll be in a small percentage there.
When? as the head of the Bank of Canada under Harper?!
The last 5 years he's been advising Trudeau.
https://www.centuryinitiative.ca/news/announcing-a-new-globe-and-mail-event-building-for-growth---housing-and-infrastructure-for-an-expanding-nation
No he hasn't. He was hired in Sept 2024 to advise Trudeau.
Your link is about a Globe & Mail event that Carney was speaking at.
Around Covid, after which we did mass immigration to prop up falling GDP :
Around the same time, in August 2020, Trudeau tapped Carney to serve as an “informal adviser” on the government’s pandemic recovery plan.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/article/who-is-mark-carney-the-former-central-banker-running-to-be-liberal-leader/
You keep posting links that you think prove your point but they really don't.
Do I think Carney is the best Canada deserves? Absolutely not
Do I think he's the man that's gonna keep our country afloat during this trade war and stand up to the orange buffoon? Absolutely.
Alright well, that's just silly. Even the Bank of Canada admits its inflated housing.
Carney never said a single thing against mass immigration until Trudeau did, and it was only after the polls turned deeply negative for the Liberals. The Liberals didn't care at all until their polls suffered, even though they ran on fixing housing every single election.
It was done to invert the Phillips curve and prevent a wage price spiral, at the expense of the poor and renters, so I actually assume Carney told him to do it.
where does it say that in the link you posted? looks like just another think tank
Oh. I'm sorry. I guess then pay attention as to how trump's story goes. I don't know now how it's going to go. I hope to be dead by then.
Id guess it knocks over Canada's housing bubble they built, and we have a lost decade like Japan due to trillions in misallocated capital.
Its mainly full recourse loans as well, its incredibly irresponsible to do mass immigration and stoke demand to distort the market. Its almost like they wilfully broke our country to push climate policy, I can't see any other way to explain it.
Well said.