this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
641 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68187 readers
3674 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 69 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It certainly is a weird timeline when Apple is the good guy.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Reminds me of March 24 to November 10, 2001, when Apple had embraced Unix and -- to some extent -- open source by releasing OS X, but had not yet pivoted towards glued-shut and DRM'd consumer electronics by releasing the iPod.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

OSX was never really open sourced. If you tried compiling it, you'd have found it wouldn't work because it was incomplete.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

Darwin was just their version of BSD which they released in order to comply with the license, but the actual Desktop/UI was a separate stack. You could build and install Darwin, but it wouldn’t do anything.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah it was almost briefly cool. You could take apart and upgrade your own iPod, build your own enclosure for it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Wasn't that because they desperately needed a new OS and just acquired Steve Jobs' company NeXT who had an OS called NeXTSTEP which was based on Mach kernel and BSD. They didn't embrace Unix and open sourcing out of goodwill.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Wasn't Tim Cook one of the first to donate to Trump's Inauguration? Did they at least protest DEI scrapping (excluding some shareholders) or Gulf of Mexico rename, or bent over like rest of big tech? I'm honestly not seeing it, to me Apple is as bad as google

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

Yes. Tim Apple gave the $1M bribe to Orange Donald.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Tim Cook

Never heard of him. Do you mean Tim Apple?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

I can think of a lot of companies that are far worse than Apple.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

It's best not to humanize corporations, especially as the arbiters of morality and ethics. It's simply a calculated risk on Apples part. I don't mean to be a negative Nancy and all "nothing good happens" it's just we can't keep letting corporations get away with being brands you can "trust" when we have all the evidence necessary to assume they are not trustworthy, just profit-seeking.