this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
117 points (100.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1026 readers
77 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scholar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

So obeying any laws whatsoever is inherently undesirable?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 11 points 2 weeks ago

There is a group of Lemmy users that use the "law" to justify their censorship behavior and demands.

It is getting tiring.

But sure if instance owner doesn't wants young people posting on there, they can just block. This silly reasons are just silly though.

Just say you don't want to deal with it and move on.

This appeal to authorita is disingenuous IMHO

[–] nomugisan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago

It depends on your opinion. Anarchy isn't a prescriptive unitary ideology, and it's got a lot of different things behind it and subgroups and whatever. You can have Stirner's Egoist perspective on laws, being that you just follow whatever laws suit your own ego, or you can have the Illegalists' perspective on laws, that they're all worth breaking.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago

Not necessarily, e.g., if they align with your values. But age restricting access to a general purpose platform seems very nanny state to me.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Obeying laws that serve no purpose is a bootlicker exercise

Exactly my point.

[–] scholar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

How about the laws that serve a purpose?

Do you think this is one of those? Do you think a law designed to favor conservative parental rights movements who seek to oppress and own children, and cut them off from their support networks serves a valid or reasonable purpose?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

If the law has a clear purpose and that purpose is beneficial to the working class, I don't need it tp be a law. I just go along with it because that's how we make society work.

Now I know you're not only not a real anarchist or have any understanding of anarchism whatsoever but likely a bootlicker too.