this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
236 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

15442 readers
1444 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/26858904

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/39969354

The Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education, or FURRIES, Act, filed by Austin-area Republican State Rep. Stan Gerdes, would "prohibit any non-human behavior by a student, including presenting himself or herself, on days other than exempt days, as anything other than a human being."

The law would allow for exempt days, such as Halloween and other school dress-up days.

The law defines "non-human" behavior as "any type of behavior or accessory displayed by a student in a school district other than behaviors or accessories typically displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species," with provided examples being:

Using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine or other human byproducts

A personal or outward display, except during a school play or by a school mascot, through surgical or superficial means of features that are non-human such as using tails, leashes, collars or other accessories designed for pets

Using fur, other than naturally occurring human hair or a wig made to look like human hair

Artificial, animal-like ears

Other physiological features that have not historically been assigned to the human race through a means of natural biological development

Students who bark, meow, hiss or make other animal noises that are not human speech

Licking oneself or others for the purpose of grooming or maintenance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

seriously? seems fine for the most part

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Should the government regulate space aliens in school too? Why not target the infinity of scenarios that never happens, or should we just skip straight to mandating that school is only for nazi salutes?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't American students already heil and recite oaths to a flag regularly?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

We don't "heil" in school... Yet.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bellamy salute

this was before the Nazi's and facists ruined it.

You might also be interested to know that the Charlie Chaplin style of mustache was the most popular in world until Hitler wore it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

AFAIK it was the maximum amount of beard allowed for soldiers at the end of World War 1, because of the gas masks.
So millions of men returned from the war with that moustache.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

When kids do it, it’s called the Bellamy salute.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

that never happens

well, furries exist and are popular especially among younger people. I wouldn't want my kid to be exposed to that

also, that fact that they explicitly named using a litterbox instead of a toilet as an expample is telling. with a law prohibiting this and similar things, nothing of value is lost

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

we should always make our laws based off of propaganda and not reality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

if those things don't exist, noone should have a problem with them being forbidden. it'd be like prohibiting you from travlling to the other end of the galaxy. why should you care?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I totally agree! That's why I'm in favor of repealing the fourth amendment. If you aren't hiding anything illegal in your house, then you should have no problem with the police searching it. Why should you care?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And I don't want my kid exposed to Mormons. Unfortunately, your rights end where my rights begin

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Mormon priests do the Catholic CSA thing too

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't want my kid to be exposed to that

Better never let your kids use the internet, then

As for the litterbox thing, it was a hoax:

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you wanted to protect your kids, you'd be opposing fascism not furries.

You're just a bigot hiding behind your kids. You'll fit right in with the fascists.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I can and do oppose both

also nice work normalizing fascism

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Free speech violations are fine when I don't like the speech